1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksana_A [137]
3 years ago
15

Fundamentally, the dispute between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the Washington administration came down to the

fact that
History
2 answers:
bazaltina [42]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Fundamentally, the dispute between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the Washington administration came down to the fact that both Founding Fathers had different views regarding economy and political organization of the government.

Explanation:

Hamilton, although of humble origin, developed an urban and sophisticated worldview, and was appointed Secretary of the Treasury by George Washington, of whom he was an assistant during the War of Independence, and who had him as the most outstanding intellectual of his cabinet. Hamilton defended the need for a strong central government that would stimulate commerce and industry. He set up a federal central bank to spread credit, given that the Constitution did not prohibit it, and proposed protectionist tariffs to develop the national productive apparatus by making foreign imports more expensive.

Jefferson, on the other hand, distrusted a strong central government, while postulating the idea of ​​a virtuous republic, subject to the control of society and supported by small farmers. He thought it was better to distribute power among states and local entities to protect individual rights from the risk of tyranny, his greatest terror. Apart from its explicit rejection of indebtedness that future generations would have to pay by means of taxes, his argument against the great federal bank dismantled and reversed Hamilton's reasoning: as the 1787 Constitution did not expressly authorize the creation of that credit institution, the government should not found it. For Jefferson, the limits of legality were very clear: the government could only do what the law ordered; society, on the other hand, could do everything that the law did not prohibit.

8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Fundamentally, the dispute between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the Washington administration came down to the fact that Hamilton wanted the national government to be far more powerful, while Jefferson believed the states should retain most of the power. </span>
You might be interested in
The Britons or Celts were slaughtered by the Anglo-Saxons who called the Celts “Wi-las.” What does it mean
stellarik [79]

Answer:

Its an insult that means ugly a** bird or

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why would farmers support this populist Party belief in 1896?
LiRa [457]

The farmers would support the populist Party belief in 1896 when "Farmers would see higher crop prices due to inflation."

This is evident in the fact that the Populist party advocate for the government to place the value of the dollar-based on Silver.

This would then make the prices of products sold at inflated prices, thereby making the farmers earn more revenue and, in turn, can pay their debt.

Option A is wrong because the Populist Party did not advocate for equal transportation fees.

Option B is wrong because the Populist Party did not advocate for loans for individuals from the national banks.

Option C is wrong because the populist party did not advocate for subsidies for railroad owners.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option D. "Farmers would see higher crop prices due to inflation."

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/18169827

3 0
3 years ago
He was the voice of the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa.
vovikov84 [41]
I do think it is Nelson Maldela I hope this helped. I'm not 100% sure but I recognize the name and remember reading about him.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
FINAL GIVE AWAY SINCE I GOT EXPERT SO FAST!!
tino4ka555 [31]

Answer:

Thanks

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1774, the First Continental Congress suggested that colonists boycott British goods to protest
Bezzdna [24]
In 1774, the First Continental Congress suggested that colonists boycott British goods to protest "<span>c. the Intolerable Acts," since it was clear that the colonists would no longer tolerate such taxation. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following events occurred first, second, and third?
    7·2 answers
  • Which should determine your living expenditures each month?
    8·1 answer
  • Match each type of country with one of its central features
    10·2 answers
  • Who was Muhammad ??​
    9·2 answers
  • True or False -Please write True or False after the sentence.
    12·1 answer
  • I have finals pls help​
    9·2 answers
  • In his speech, what did Mr. Douglass say he would give a general outline of?
    13·1 answer
  • 9.<br> What Pope gave a speech<br> encouraging the First Crusade?
    11·2 answers
  • 14.
    12·1 answer
  • 21) Prior to 1756, Britain was able to effectively micro-manage the activities of its North American colonies.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!