1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksana_A [137]
3 years ago
15

Fundamentally, the dispute between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the Washington administration came down to the

fact that
History
2 answers:
bazaltina [42]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Fundamentally, the dispute between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the Washington administration came down to the fact that both Founding Fathers had different views regarding economy and political organization of the government.

Explanation:

Hamilton, although of humble origin, developed an urban and sophisticated worldview, and was appointed Secretary of the Treasury by George Washington, of whom he was an assistant during the War of Independence, and who had him as the most outstanding intellectual of his cabinet. Hamilton defended the need for a strong central government that would stimulate commerce and industry. He set up a federal central bank to spread credit, given that the Constitution did not prohibit it, and proposed protectionist tariffs to develop the national productive apparatus by making foreign imports more expensive.

Jefferson, on the other hand, distrusted a strong central government, while postulating the idea of ​​a virtuous republic, subject to the control of society and supported by small farmers. He thought it was better to distribute power among states and local entities to protect individual rights from the risk of tyranny, his greatest terror. Apart from its explicit rejection of indebtedness that future generations would have to pay by means of taxes, his argument against the great federal bank dismantled and reversed Hamilton's reasoning: as the 1787 Constitution did not expressly authorize the creation of that credit institution, the government should not found it. For Jefferson, the limits of legality were very clear: the government could only do what the law ordered; society, on the other hand, could do everything that the law did not prohibit.

8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago
4 0
<span>Fundamentally, the dispute between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton during the Washington administration came down to the fact that Hamilton wanted the national government to be far more powerful, while Jefferson believed the states should retain most of the power. </span>
You might be interested in
To what extent was the Zhou state similar to contemporary Southwest Asian empires?
dangina [55]
Empires associated inaccessible locales through basic dialects, bringing together political frameworks, and shared religious convictions. A few districts did not encounter the ascent of the domain. The people groups of South Asia were joined less through shared political frameworks than through shared societies and religious convictions. Exchange additionally joined locales. For instance, the business exercises of waterfront urban areas, for example, Byblos and Tire came to similarly as—and now and then more remote than—the realms' military victories. There were extraordinary varieties inside and crosswise over Afro-Eurasia. 


A third factor was innovative change. Pack camels, secure vessels, press apparatuses for development, and iron weapons for fighting were essential new fixings in the ascent of magnificent foundations. The main thousand years domains were incorporated and mobilized states that utilized power to grow their limits, and the part of changing innovation was huge in this procedure.
4 0
3 years ago
Who said it Sam Houston or Lamar? Please hurry
3241004551 [841]
Think it was mr Sam hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
List four reasons why you wouldnt want to be a Roman Prisoner. what would be your fate?
Eva8 [605]
The fate of a Roman prisoners would be death: whipped to death ,branded on the forehead, forced to carry heavy wood around their neck, beheading,
6 0
4 years ago
What do you think were General McClellan’s major tactical errors?
Diano4ka-milaya [45]
General McClellan was excessively careful. He needed to ensure that the catch of Richmond would go precisely his way, however he didn't try watching that there was no one suspicious of his activities. Holding up and holding up to make it consummate, his armed force at last got busted.
4 0
3 years ago
Someone who is intent on going to college should
Ugo [173]

Answer:

He or she should me the ideal student.

Explanation:

Because he or she knows that education is important in our life. So to get education we should go to colleges and schools.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 15.   Who initiated the phrase "manifest destiny"?
    9·1 answer
  • What’s the definition of law of conservation of mass
    5·2 answers
  • While many Russian soldiers were on the front during World War I, most of those who remained behind responded to the February Re
    5·1 answer
  • Which two pivotal events that took place in 1980 led to the establishment of strategic management as a field of study?
    9·1 answer
  • How does the candidate support his argument for presidential debate of 2020 ? ​
    10·1 answer
  • The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 angered northerners because
    14·2 answers
  • What jobs does a Senator perform? Check all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • Identify and explain one way the industrial revolution changed the world? (Answer cite and explain format )
    12·1 answer
  • _____ and trade were the two main sources of revenue.
    13·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!