I do believe Mesopotamia is considered the oldest civilization of the Old World and often referred to as the Cradle of Civilization which passes from present day eastern Turkey to The Gulf of Iraq
When giving the cyclops his name, it gives him the
ability to curse him. He wanted to give him his name from his pride and courage
he had, which led to his weakness. Also, he wanted him to be remembered by the
cyclops. That is bad and good because he could curse him and remember him so he
can hunt him down, and good because he will always remember him as the guy who
defeated me and outwitted me.
(I wrote this answer for my school)
Hoped I helped!
I am going to assume here you are referring to the 'Scramble of Africa' that happened in the second half of the 19th century, as the European power did not really control the African regions before then.
The methods contexts did differ per colonising power and colonised region, but it boils down to the following factors:
- superior firepower, equipment and recourses; having better guns, armour, communication technology, and supply routes, made the Europeans a formidable enemy that the various tribes simply could not counter.
- co-opting the local elites; a tried and tested method for centuries, this has always been the way smart conquerers could maintain control over a region with minimal fuss and expenditur.
<span>- divide and conquer; conflict between the many tribes of Africa has been a constant for centuries in the continent. The Europeans could easily manipulate the various tribes against each other to prevent a unified resistance from rising up. </span>
<span>- a willingness to use extreme forms of terror; the Europeans might have been all high and mighty back home about their Enlightment and democracy, but in Africa they were more than willing to use forms of terror that would make most contemporary dictators feel a little uneasy. Case in point, the widespread killing and mutilation when quotas were not met in king Leopold II's Congo.</span>
McCulloch v. Maryland: governed that states would be able to tax the federal government.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Court of Justice held that the federal govt had the obligation and authority to set up a federal reserve bank and that the nations had almost no ability to tax the government. Marshall rules in favor of the Government of the U.S and reached the conclusion that "the legal authority is a desire to destroy."
In McCulloch v. Maryland, the highest court examined if the Congress had the authority to set up a public bank and whether the government of Maryland had intervened with the powers of the Parliament by subsidizing the bank.
When federal courts exercise hypothetical jurisdiction, they bypass tough questions of subject-matter jurisdiction to dismiss cases on easy merits grounds.