Answer:
Total value of the investment= $57,320.73
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the future value of the first part of the investment. We will calculate the future value for the monthly deposit for five years and then the lump sum for another five years.</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= monthly deposit
i= 0.04/12= 0.003333
n= 5*12= 60 months
FV= {322*[(1.003333^60) - 1]} / 0.003333
FV= $21,348.05
<u>For the lump sum:</u>
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
n= 12*5= 60
i= 0.05/12= 0.004167
FV= 21,348.05*(1.004167^60)
FV= $27,397.75
<u>Now, the future value of the second part of the investment:</u>
<u></u>
n= 60
i= 0.0041667
A= 440
FV= {440*[(1.004167^60) - 1]} / 0.004167
FV= $29,922.98
Total value of the investment= 27,397.75 + 29,922.98
Total value of the investment= $57,320.73
Answer:
a. $412,000
Explanation:
Conversion cost is the combination of direct labor and manufacturing overhead which directly or indirectly are necessary to produce a product other than the direct raw materials.
We know,
<em>Conversion costs = Direct Labor + Manufacturing Overhead</em>
Here,
Manufacturing overhead = Indirect material + Indirect Labor + Indirect overhead (including variable and fixed overhead)
Given,
Direct labor = $195,300
Manufacturing overhead = Factory overhead = $216,700
Selling expenses will not be included because it is not a direct or indirect overhead expense.
Therefore,
<em>Conversion costs = </em>$195,300 + $216,700
<em>Conversion costs = </em>$412,000
Answer:
Explanation:
We shall apply the concept of coefficient of variation to know the consistency of data
coefficient of variation
= standard deviation / mean or average
In case of City A
coefficient of variation = 86 / 820
= .1048
In case of City B
coefficient of variation = 75 / 790
= .0949
Since it is less for city B , rent for this city is more consistence or with less of variation
So the conclusion is false.
