Answer:
Similarities
1. Both documents advocated for the rights and liberty of the citizens.
2. Both documents prevented autocratic rule by ensuring the proper representation of the people.
Differences
1. The English Bill of Rights was borne out of political tensions while the US Bill of Rights was an amendment to the constitution.
2. They both differed in content. The English Bill of Rights contained information on the rights of citizens, reasons while the then Monarchs were rightful successors to the throne, and details of the ills committed by King James. The US Bill of Rights simply amended the constitution.
Explanation:
The English Bill of Rights was signed into law in the year 1689 by William III and Mary II in response to the political and religious tensions happening at the time. This Bill of Rights gave powers to the Parliament and made them a source that must be consulted before critical decisions were made by the Monarchs. It also outlined the rights of citizens.
The US Bill of Rights received its blueprint from the English Bill of Rights. It was established in 1789 as 12 amendments to the constitution. It outlined the rights of the United States citizens, one of which was the Freedom of Speech.
( A ) It illustrates the ideal of platonic love.
Metaphysical poets such as John Donne and Andrew Marvell, among others, made use of metaphysical conceits to explore the relationship between lovers.
Answer:
exibits
Explanation:
a noun phrase denoting a person or thing that is the recipient of the action of a transitive verb, for example the dog in Jimmy fed the dog.
That the father choose the husband!
Answer:
The answer is that "women shouldn't unite because men won't listen to what they are saying".
Explanation:
This obviously is the opinion of the second speaker.
Speaker one said that "women should unite to free themselves from the control of men"
Speaker three also gave his own opinion as: " women should blame and hate Nature for the inequalities
women need men to live because men provide everything for women".
The second speaker negates the opinion of other speakers by saying that "women shouldn't unite because men won't listen to what they are saying".
