Answer:
$30.07
Explanation:
Rocky river company uses target pricing
The production volume is 602,000 units
The market price is $34 per unit
The total assets is $13,900,000
The desired operating income is 17% of the total assets
= 17/100 × 13,900,000
= 0.17×13,900,000
= 2,363,000
The first step is to calculate the sales value
= 602,000 ×34
= 20,468,000
The total cost can be calculated as follows
= Sales value-desired operating income
= 20,468,000-2,363,000
= 18,105,000
Therefore the target full product cost per unit can be calculated as follows
= Total cost/production volume
= 18,105,000/602,000
= $30.07
Hence the full target product cost per unit is $30.07
Answer:The information was expected is the most likely reason why a stock price might not react at all on the day that new information related to the stock’s issuer is released. Assuming the market is semi strong form efficient.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The major reason that the stock price might not react to the information related to that stock was the expectancy of information in advance. It was a piece of expected information. When something is expected then our response towards it does not bring much change.
Similarly, when it is already expected to get some information related to the stock, on receiving that information the stock price does not react. It means it might neither fall nor rise.
Answer:
channel it and make it limited
Answer:
The classical view of social responsibility is that managers today are employees with a primary responsibility to shareholders and their single focus should be on generating financial returns.
Explanation:
Typically, a simple way to think of an input is anything that costs money. These can be both good and bad things. A simple example would be: if I had a machine that made candy: my inputs would be the energy required to run the machine, the person required to work the machine, and the ingredients I had to put in to make the candy. My outputs might be the candy the machine made and the happiness it gave to people who ate it. A negative output might be that it made people unhealthy.
As an internet company eBay does not have many of the typical inputs of doing business. For example, it does NOT have the cost of physical stores nor does it have the cost of depreciating inventory or any machines. For eBay, some examples of inputs would be it's people such as software engineers, marketing team, and executive staff. All overhead such as office space and the electricity to power its office space would be another example. Other examples could include the physical code behind eBay's software and money used to finance the company, and the data warehouses used to store everything.
Outputs can be thought of as the value a company creates. eBay's outputs are also somewhat atypical. eBay does not create a physical product that they then sell so that makes this a challenging question. You could argue that eBay's store or its platform is an output. All the data it produces as a company is an output and has a lot of value. Since eBay allows people across the world to open up their own store online, you could say it's creating the social good of jobs or entrepreneurship "global employment" through this action (eBay has supported this publicly as well so you could look up more about it on Google). Another output could be eBay stores created by sellers. eBay owns PayPal so if you can think of any related to PayPal you could include those as well and cite that eBay owns the company.
Hope that helps
