Answer:
a. Yes
Based on the data given, it appears that specifications are being met.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5 Average
12.5 13.4 13.0 13.2 12.9 65 13.00
12.7 13.2 13.6 12.7 13.5 65.7 13.14
12.9 13.0 13.3 13.3 13.2 65.7 13.14
13.2 13.1 13.4 12.7 13.2 65.6 13.12
Totals 51.4 52.7 53.2 51.9 52.7 261.9 52.4
Average 12.85 13.17 13.3 12.97 13.17 13.1
b) Using the law of averages, the process specifications of 12.45 and 13.35 minutes were not exceeded under any sample type. Therefore, it can be concluded that the process specifications are being met.
Answer: D. The actual value of the contract is less than $30 million for each year he plays.
Explanation:
Given that Mark sherzer will be paid $15 million per year for 14 years reflects a contract whose value at the time of signing is ($15 million × 14) = $210 million. However, the payment would not be paid at the of signing but spread over a period of 14 years with $15 million being splashed out annually. However, considering the time value of money, whereby the present value of a fixed amount decreases with time. Hence in actual sense, the $210 million face worth of the contract will actually be less than $30 million [$210/7(playing years)] as time progresses on the fixed amount paid yearly due to reduction in the value of the present value as time progresses.
I feel that D would be the correct answer because of new technology
Explanation:
insurances customers don't have a complicated need they want to be able to choose from a good selection of policies at a responsible prices they want clear transparent information and their wants more than hassle-free interactions
hope it helps u
