Answer: D. When an organization is planning for mass casualty incidents, an effective approach is to request law enforcement personnel to develop a separate plan for mass casualty incidents for the organization.
Explanation:
Mass casualty incident refers to a situation in which medical services are overwhelmed by the number of casualties.
From the options given, the false statement is that "When an organization is planning for mass casualty incidents, an effective approach is to request law enforcement personnel to develop a separate plan for mass casualty incidents for the organization".
This is incorrect. In a mass casualty, a separate plan cannot be developed for an organization. All the casualties are entitled to same plan.
Answer:
Debbie Brooks is the one who will suffer the loss for the checks paid with Brook's forged signature.
Explanation:
Debbie Brooks is the one who will suffer the loss for the checks paid with Brook's forged signature because Brooks was supposed to be checking the statement regarding her accounts frequently . By that, she could have discovered that Tingstrom had taken $85,000 from her checking account with Transamerica Financial Advisors and hence be able to sue her.
After Debbies Brooks discovered what Martha had done, she should have have stopped the transaction immediately but instead another year passed before she filed a suit against Transamerica. Hence, she will be one who will suffer from the forged signature.
Answer:
c. producers
Explanation:
Since it is given in the question that the price elasticity of demand is relatively elastic but the price elastic of supply is relatively inelastic but if the excise tax is imposed on the goods so the greater burden of the tax would be on the producers as the supply is inelastic so the producers could not changed much but if we compare to the consumers, the consumer could change the demand more than before due to the elastic in demand.
So, the correct option is c.
Answer:
Lowa should produce corn; Nebraska should produce Wheat
Explanation:
Two states: Iowa and Nebraska
Same two goods are produced by both of them: Corn and wheat
For lowa,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = 3 bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of wheat
For Nebraska,
Opportunity cost of producing wheat = (1 ÷ 3) bushels of corn
Opportunity cost of producing corn = 3 bushels of wheat
According to the concept of comparative advantage, a country is exporting the commodity in which it has a comparative advantage and a country has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity is lower than the other country.
In our case, lowa should producing and exporting corn because the opportunity cost of producing corn is lower than the Nebraska and on the other hand, Nebraska should producing and exporting wheat because the opportunity cost of producing wheat is lower than the lowa.
The false statement about cover letters is that: C. a cover letter is sent before a résumé so that the employer knows it is coming.
<h3>What is a
cover letter?</h3>
A cover letter can be defined as a type of letter that is attached as an introduction and it generally accompanies another document such as a résumé.
This ultimately implies that, the false statement about cover letters is saying it's sent before a résumé to an employer of labor, so he or she knows it is coming.
Read more on cover letters here: brainly.com/question/24136973
#SPJ1
