Answer:
1. Must Gidgits Galore provide its employees with benefits? No
2. Does Gidgits Galore have to implement a payroll tax for unemployment, workers' compensation, or Social Security? Yes
3. Gidgits Galore is concerned about hiring employees from other countries whose language skills may not be proficient and is considering hiring only native English speakers. Is this a good idea? No
4. Does the Commerce Clause have an effect on Gidgits Galore? Yes
5. Can Gidgits Galore face any repercussions if it disregards Title VII? Yes
6. Gidgits Galore is concerned about hiring employees from other countries whose language skills may not be proficient and is considering hiring only native English speakers. Would this represent "disparate treatment"? Yes
7. Gidgits Galore wants a "young and hip" workforce. Is there a problem if it chooses not to hire anyone over the age of forty? Yes
8. Gidgits Galore wants to put a section in its updated employment manual preventing employees from taking more than thirty days from work without pay, regardless of the reason. Is this a good idea? No
9. What if Gidgits Galore wants to add a provision to its employee manual preventing employees from forming a union? Can this be done? No
Explanation:
Edge 2021
Answer:
B. Sending accounts receivable confirmations.
According to Quora dot com, US magazines are viewed as historically dependent on advertising revenue hence why subscriptions to magazines are historically very low as advertising is used to subsidise cover price or subscription cost.
With the general collapse of print publications in the US, particularly led by the drying up of physical newsstand presence, magazines have a harder time getting into consumer's hands. This means that advertisers are less likely to spend in a publication (readership decreasing) and then advertising revenues go down, making magazines less and less profitable.
I realize this is quit lengthy so I'd sum it up to saying the business model for magazines has traditionally been the selling of advertising space ... Not sure if this is what you're looking for
Answer:
0.98
Explanation:
Computation for Bill Duke portfolio's beta
First step is to find the Investment in Y which is:
Investment in Y=100,000-35,000
=$65,000
Second step is to calculate for the Portfolio beta using this formula
Portfolio beta=Respective beta*Respective Investment weight
Portfolio beta =(35,000/100,000*1.5)+(65,000/100,000*0.7)
Portfolio beta=(0.35*1.5) +(0.65*0.7)
Portfolio beta =0.525 +0.455
Portfolio beta=0.98
Therefore the Portfolio Beta will be 0.98
