All categories

3 years ago

Plz help ASAP I have been stuck on this forever!!!

Mathematics

2 answers:

Klio2033 [76]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

He didn't make any mistakes all is correct

mart [117]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

He made no Mistake at all.

You might be interested in

9. What is the range of the relation [(4, 2), (1, 1), (0, 0). (1.-1). (4, -2) ?

nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

{-2,-1,0,1,2}

Step-by-step explanation:

When we are talking of the range, we are referring to the possible y-values the relation can take

Hence, a set of y-values will represent the range of the relation

we have this as:

{2, 1 , 0, -1 , -2}

Arranging in order, we have ;

{-2,-1,0,1,2}

8 0

3 years ago

There was 2,605 people at a basketball game. A reporter rounded this number to the nearest hundred for a news paper article. Wha

Vlad [161]

2,605 rounded to the nearest hundred......now find the number in the hundreds place...it is the 6....now look at the number to the right of it...if that number is 5 or above, u round the 6 to a 7....but if that number is 4 or below, that 6 stays the same. The number to the right of 6 is 0.....so the 6 stays the same...and ur answer is 2,600.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In triangle JKL, m of angle J = 90, m of angle K = 30, and m of angle L = 60. Which of the following statements about triangle J

Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

# Answer B is true ⇒ KL = 2(JL)

# Answer C is true ⇒ JK = √3(JL)

# Answer F is true ⇒ JK = √3/2(KL)

Step-by-step explanation:

* Lets explain the ratio between the sides of the triangle

- In Δ JKL

∵ The measure of angle J is 90°

∴ KL is the hypotenuse

∵ The measure of angle K is 30°

∴ JL is the opposite side to angle 30°

∵ The measure of angle L is 60°

∴ JK is the opposite side to the angle 60°

- There is a fact in the triangle which has angles 30° , 60° , 90°

# The length of the side opposite to the angle of measure 30° is

half the length of the hypotenuse

∵ KL is the hypotenuse

∵ JL is the opposite side to the angle of measure 30°

∴ JL = 1/2 KL OR KL = 2 JL

# The length of the side opposite to the angle of measure 60° is

√3 the length of the opposite side to the angle 30°

∵ JK is the opposite side to the angle of measure 60°

∵ JL is the opposite side to the angle of measure 30°

∴ JK = √3 JL

# The length of the side opposite to the angle of measure 60° is also

half √3 the length of the hypotenuse

∵ JK is the opposite side to the angle of measure 60°

∵ KL is the hypotenuse

∴ JK = √3/2 KL

- From the relation above

# Answer B is true ⇒ KL = 2(JL)

# Answer C is true ⇒ JK = √3(JL)

# Answer F is true ⇒ JK = √3/2(KL)

6 0

4 years ago

Would love the help .

Fed [463]

I cannot see the image no matter what I do

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help me!!!! Help me find the dimensions. :(

Gnom [1K]

The volume, surface area and the ratios of the SA to volume will be as follows:
Volume=πr²h
Area=2πr²+πdh
Ratio of SA to volume=Area/volume
π=3.14
Thus using the above formula:

1.
a]
Radius: 3 inches
Height: 2 inches
Volume=πr²h
volume=π×3²×2=56.52 in³

b]
Area=2πr²+πdh
2×π×3²+π×2×3×2
=56.55+37.68
=94.23 in²

c]
Ratio=area/volume
=94.23/56.52
=1.6672

1.
Radius: 2 inches
Height: 9 inches

a]
V=πr²h
V=3.14*2^2*9
V=113.04 in³

b]
Area=2πr²+πdh
=2*3.14*2^2+3.14*2*2*9
=25.12+113.04
=138.16 in²

c]
Ratio=area/volume
=138.16/113.04
=11/9

3.
Diameter=4 inches
Height= 9 inches

a]
V=πr²h
V=3.14×2²×9
V=113.04

b]
Area=2πr²+πdh
=2*3.14*2^2+3.14*4*9
=25.12+113.04
=138.16 in²

c]
Ratio=area/volume
=138.16/113.04
=11/9

4]
Diameter: 6 inches
Height: 4 inches

a]
Volume=πr²h
=3.14×3²×4
=113.04 in³

b]
Area=2πr²+πdh
=2×3.14×3²+3.14×6×4
=56.52+75.36
=131.88 in²

c] Ratio
131.88/113.04
=7/6

1. For the surface area to volume to be small it means that the area is smaller than the volume, for surface area to volume be larger it means that the surface area is larger than the volume. It is more economical for the surface area to volume to be small because it will mean that small amount of materials make cans with large volume. This means cost of production is cheaper.

2. To evaluate this process let's use one of the dimensions:
Radius: 3 inches
Height: 2 inches:

i. add radius and height:
3+2=5 inches
ii. Multiply radius and height:
3×2=6
iii. Dividing the result from step 1 by the result in step 2:
5/6

iv. Multiply the result from step 3 by 2:
5/6×6
=5
This result does not seem to add up to the result in our earlier ratio. Thus we conclude that Khianna was wrong. This method can't work with 3-D figures.

7 0

4 years ago