1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garik1379 [7]
3 years ago
5

Diplomatic immunity is based on what assumption

History
2 answers:
Viktor [21]3 years ago
8 0
It is based on the assumption that the <span>diplomats will obey the laws of their country of residence. They don't have to abide by laws because they have immunity that protects them from prosecution. This was introduced to make it possible for diplomats to say what they wanted against those who ruled without being prosecuted.</span>
s2008m [1.1K]3 years ago
5 0

Diplomatic immunity is assumed based on the state diplomats will obey the laws in which their country of residence.

<h2>Further Explanation </h2>

Diplomatic immunity is a type of impunity that ensures that diplomats can serve safely and cannot be prosecuted or arrested by the state apparatus in their place of duty. Modern diplomatic immunity has been codified as international law in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) which has been ratified by almost all countries, even though the concepts and customs which provide diplomatic immunity have existed for thousands of years. Many principles of diplomatic immunity are now considered an international custom. Diplomatic immunity allows for the formation of relations between governments, including in difficult times and even wars.

Diplomacy is the art and practice of negotiating by someone (called a diplomat) who usually represents a country or organization. The word diplomacy itself is usually directly related to international diplomacy which usually takes care of various things such as culture, economy, and trade. Usually, people think of diplomacy as a way to benefit from soft words. International agreements are generally negotiated by diplomats before they are approved by the state authorities. The term diplomacy was introduced into English by Edward Burke in 1796 based on a French word, diplomatic.

Learn More

Diplomatic immunity brainly.com/question/1846759

modern diplomatic brainly.com/question/1846759

Details

Class: High School

Subject: History

Keyword: diplomatic, law, immunity

You might be interested in
Using the Pythagorean Theorem, find the length of a leg of a right triangle if the other leg is 8 ft long and the hypotenuse is
Contact [7]

Answer:

C. 6ft

Explanation:

the Pythagorean theorem states a^2+b^2=√c the inverse to find the leg would be a=√(c^2-b^2)

3 0
3 years ago
How did North American independence influence Mexican and Central American independence?
ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

B. only the mexican war of independence eliminated spanish colonial control over part of North America

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Overtime, how did Hammurabi's Code influence ideas about government?
Art [367]

Answer:

The Code of Hammurabi was one of the first legislative compilations of the civilized world, coming from Mesopotamia around the year 1700 BC.

This Code laid the foundations of social coexistence in Mesopotamian cities, basing its legislation on the Talion Law, by which all action required a consequence of a similar or identical nature to the contrary. Thus, there was the first documented case of retributive justice, in which people received consequences according to the actions they took.

This principle, synthesized in the phrase "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth", laid the foundations of what we now know as justice, since it gave each action a logical result. Thus, today governments apply a commutative and corrective justice evolved from this ancient way of imparting justice, but continuing with the conception that every action has a necessary consequence.

4 0
3 years ago
World War I has begun. You are the leader of a
notka56 [123]
Well I’m not going to write an entire essay for you, but here are some points that might help. I would encourage you to write about how you would join the war.
Consider that those who don’t join the war will be looked upon unfavourably by most, especially allies they swore to help. Essentially, you would be treated poorly at post-war negotiations.
Also consider the nationalist fervour present among the populous in most European states. People were rather excited for war in many cases, with many believing the war would be over by the Christmas of 1914. Not many knew the true horror of what would transpire during the war, and those who did didn’t make it known to the civilian population whose support they relied upon. Finally, bring up how Belgium declared neutrality but was still invaded by the German army.
7 0
2 years ago
When a federal law or regulation takes over and precludes enforcement of a state or local law or regulation it is termed:
fiasKO [112]
C. preemption is the answer to your question.


I hope I helped.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Were vocal and instrumental music equally popular? If not, which was most popular?
    12·2 answers
  • Which economic system do most countries operate under today?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following describes an outcome of Russification?
    10·2 answers
  • Who is the most powerful greek god
    12·2 answers
  • Which disease was one of the panama canals biggest changes?
    12·2 answers
  • What happened to white government after radical republicans took control 1866
    7·1 answer
  • Did George Washington ever attended a university
    7·1 answer
  • George Washington talked about foreign alliances in his farewell address. How did George Washington feel about foreign alliances
    12·1 answer
  • WHICH RELIGION WAS NOT PRESENT IN OTTOMAN PALESTINE?<br> A.Islam <br> B.Hinduism <br> C.Judaism
    8·1 answer
  • PLZZ HURRY!!
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!