1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ad-work [718]
3 years ago
6

How is government in the United States today different from government in ancient AthensWhich responsibilities were assigned to

the central government under the Articles of Confederation?
History
1 answer:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
6 0

The government in the United States today is different from government in ancient Athen, in a way that the United States is a republic.

The responsibilities that were assigned to the federal government under the Articles of Confederation is drawing up treaties.

You might be interested in
Both Noh Theater and Kabuki Theater incorporated music and dance
nata0808 [166]
Yes........................
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
explain the differences between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. how were these differences resolved
Delicious77 [7]
Both plans involved how the new Constitution would define representation in Congress. The Virginia Plan proposed that the number of delegates be based upon population, thus favoring larger states with more people. The New Jersey Plan proposed that each state have an equal number of delegates, thus favoring smaller states with fewer people. 

Under the Virginia Plan, a state like Virginia would have had a much greater say in Congress than smaller New Jersey since Virginia had a larger population. Under the New Jersey Plan, New Jerseyans would have had a disproportionate say relative to Virginians. Consider this, if each state had two delegates (under the NJ Plan) let's say New Jersey had 500,000 people and Virginia had 1,000,000 (not the real numbers). With two delegates, New Jersey would have had 1 say in Congress per 250,000 voters while Virginia would have had 1 say in Congress per 500,000 voters. 

These differences were resolved by creating a bicameral legislature. Today, the House of Representatives is a remnant of the Virginia Plan. States with larger populations have more seats in the House than those with smaller populations. For example, California has far more Representatives than Wyoming meaning California has a much greater say in the House. The Senate, on the other hand, is a remnant of the New Jersey Plan. Each state has two Senators regardless of population, which means each state has an equal say. Again, California has two Senators and Wyoming has two Senators despite the fact that California is much larger than Wyoming - this gives Wyoming a much greater say per voters than California. No law can pass through Congress without approval from both chambers of Congress, which means that smaller states are not overpowered, while larger states still have the ability to set the agenda. 
6 0
3 years ago
With the industrial revolution came opportunities for women to
Black_prince [1.1K]

Because of industrial revolution, women have the opportunities to: A. Work outside the home in factories

Prior to industrial revolution, almost all jobs that exist in society utilize physical strength, which basically made women became less productive compared to men. After the industrial revolution, machinery replaced these physical works. This opened up paths for women to work outside the home in factories.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Por que origem desse termo expressa um preconceito histórico?
Mumz [18]

Answer: Why origin desse thermo expressa um historical preconceit?

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
DIA [1.3K]

Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:

A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.

<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>

This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.

In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.

Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • To many Israeli Jews, Yasser Arafat is viewed as a
    13·2 answers
  • Ancient egyptian civilization_
    14·1 answer
  • Under the rule of the Zhou dynasty (1045-700 ) BCE in China, a new theory about the right of rulership emerged. What is it?
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Why are India's cities growing so fast?
    10·2 answers
  • 3. Which of the following is an example of discrimination against<br>blacks?<br>​
    10·2 answers
  • Account of william hawkins stay in india
    9·1 answer
  • Cual fue el impase y como era resuelto?
    14·2 answers
  • Most bills don't get passed because there are just a lot of ways for a bill
    8·1 answer
  • Qual dessas Pólis grega é considerada um berço da filosofia ocidental e do conceito de democracia A.Tebas B.Corinto C.Atenas D.E
    7·1 answer
  • What are some of the responsibilities of the Arizona Governor?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!