1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natasha_Volkova [10]
3 years ago
13

Which one of the following statements is correct? Multiple Choice Stocks can only be assigned one dividend growth rate. Preferre

d stocks generally have variable growth rates. Dividend growth rates must be either zero or positive. All stocks can be valued using the dividend discount models. Stocks can have negative growth rates.
Business
1 answer:
ehidna [41]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Stocks can have negative growth rates.

Explanation:

The growth rate of stocks can be negative zero and positive. Hence, it is not necessary that the growth rate should be constant. Hence, the correct option in the following statement is "<u>Stocks can have negative growth rates"</u>

You might be interested in
Why would someone choose to start a franchise business?
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

The franchise organization model offers the franchisee the ability to grow under a common brand and share in the benefits of a larger group of business owners. ... Training from successful business operators. A lower risk of failure and/or loss of investments than if you were to start your own business from scratch.

6 0
3 years ago
If the demand and supply curves for product X are stable, a goverment mandated increase in the price of X will:_______
shepuryov [24]

Answer: C. . increase the quantity supplied of X and decrease the quantity demanded of X.

Explanation:

If the demand and supply curves for product X are stable, a goverment mandated increase in the price of X will result into the increase the quantity supplied of X and decrease the quantity demanded of X.

This is because when there is a rise in price, the suppliers will be willing to supply more while the consumers will demand less of the product.

4 0
3 years ago
If bonds for Crayon Corporation, with a face value of $150,000, are converted into common stock when the carrying value of the b
Llana [10]

Answer:

(C) Bonds Payable for $150,000

Explanation:

the face value of the bonds will the value at which bonds payable account enter the accounting. Then, there is a discount which decrease the net value of the bonds:

Bonds Payable        150,000 credit

Discount on bonds   15,000  debit

When the bonds are converted, we will write-off these account against common stock and additional paid-in

To wirte-off the account we need to post them in the other side so we got:

Bonds payable debit 150,000 debit

       Discount on bonds         15,000 credit

      Common Stock                       xx credit

      Additional paid.in                    xx credit

These makes option C correct

5 0
3 years ago
Net credit sales for the year are $750,000. The end of year accounts receivable balance is $160,000. The allowance for doubtful
alexandr402 [8]

Answer: $3000

Explanation: Allowance for doubtful accounts is the contra account to accounts receiveable when all the bad debts need to be accounted for. The bad debts reduces the accounts receivable line but all bad debts are actually deducted from the allowance for doubtful accounts.

The allowance for doubtful accounts for that year is calculated as 5% of the accounts receivable balance. This amounts to $8000 (160000 x 5%) before bad debts have been accounted for. Allowance for doubtful accounts moves in the opposite direction as accounts receivable because it is a contra account to this line item. At the end of the year before year end closing entries are done, and after the bad debts have been accounted for, the balance on the allowance for doubtful accounts is $5000.

This means that bad debts for that year is:

8000 (balance before bad debts have been accounted for)

- 5000 (balance after bad debts have been accounted for)

= $3000.

5 0
3 years ago
Pedro sells investment land on September 1, 2019. Information pertaining to the sale follows: Adjusted basis $25,000 Selling pri
bearhunter [10]

The tax consequence in 2019 is $10584 while the tax consequence from 2020 to 2023 will be $13229.

Bases on the information given, the realized gain will be:

= $90000 - $25000 - $1500

= $63500

The gross profit percentage will be:

= 63500/(90000 - 18000) × 100

= 63500/72000 × 100

= 88.19%

The tax consequence in 2019 will be:

= $12000 × 88.19% = $10584

The tax consequence in 2020 will be:

= $15000 × 88.19% = $13229

The tax consequence in 2021 will be:

= $15000 × 88.19% = $13229

The tax consequence in 2022 will be:

= $15000 × 88.19% = $13229

The tax consequence in 2023 will be:

= $15000 × 88.19% = $13229

Read related link on:

brainly.com/question/25301019

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • On June 1, 2018, Jensen Company acquired an 6.2%, ten-month note receivable from a customer in settlement of an existing account
    8·1 answer
  • In IBP Exercise 09-03 you ran an MRP to produce only the Silver Deluxe Touring Bikes. Now, you can pick up where you left off an
    14·1 answer
  • brian buys a case of 12 bottled waters for 4.99 and a 12 pack of oreos for 5.99 for his volleyball team. there are a total of 12
    10·1 answer
  • A sole proprietorship: Multiple Choice provides limited financial liability for its owner. involves significant legal costs duri
    15·1 answer
  • If you deposit $4,800 at the end of each of the next 20 years into an account paying 10.8 percent interest, how much money will
    8·1 answer
  • Why is a long term consequence of paying less than the minimum amount due on your bills
    6·1 answer
  • Workers describe me as realistic
    10·2 answers
  • The difference between the balance of a fixed asset account and the related accumulated depreciation account is termed a.histori
    12·1 answer
  • A company's master budget for October is to manufacture and sell 30,000 units for a total sales revenue of $270,000, total varia
    13·1 answer
  • An oil cartel effectively increases the price of oil by 100% causing a shock in oil consuming countries A and B. The FED in coun
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!