Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Yes, it is very much true that marketing ethics is concerned with distinguishing between right and wrong actions and decisions that arise in a business setting. According to broad and well-established moral and ethical principles that might arise in a business setting, and any special duties or obligations that apply to persons engaged in commerce. In marketing ethics, companies try to work for the welfare and well-being of its customers as well, instead of not only focusing on the profits and sales. Community gets the benefit in larger extent when firms starts working for it by acting upon marketing ethics. Some people argue that marketing ethics is just a way to increase number of sales but in all cases, the larger community also get benefits from it.
Answer:
1. Deflation
-10%
2. In year 1 - 8 baskets
In year 2 - 8.9 baskets
3. The value of money increases
Explanation:
Deflation is a fall in general price levels. The price fell from $10 to $9. It indicates deflation has occured.
Inflation is a rise in price level.
Annual rate = (current year price - previous year price ) / previous year price
(9 - 10) / 10 = -0.1 = -10%
The annual change is negative because price level fell.
$80 would buy $80/$10 = 8 baskets of goods in year 1
$80 Will buy $80/$9 = 8.9 baskets of goods in year 2.
A fall in price levels increases the value of money because less money can buy the same basket of goods. Therefore, the purchasing power of money increases.
Answer:
The capitalized cost will be "784,592".
Explanation:
The given values are:
Initial cost = $500,000
Annual operating cost = $20,000
Interest, i = 12% i.e., 0.12
Effective Two year interest rate, i₂ =
=
As we know,
Now on putting the estimated values in the above expression, we get
⇒
⇒
⇒
So that the above is the right answer.
The only action that cannot be take is the corporation can file a lawsuit against her.
c. the corporation can file a lawsuit against her.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Here Arianna cannot file a lawsuit against the compnay because the company is not at fault but Arianna is. She committed an Ultra Vires act and hence cannot file a lawsuit against the company for a reimbursement. The company didn't had any idea about her actions and she didn't inform.
The key is to have the documentation demonstrating the individual was liable for the damage or harms that happened. Along these lines, truly, you can truly sue for about any explanation if your case meets the best possible criteria.