Answer:
A nobleman goes hunting and catches a monster who is short but has a big beard that is as long as the monster. He takes the monster and throws it in a shed, where his son finds and releases it. The nobleman tells his servant to kill his son but the servant refused. The son escaped and goes to another castle where the little monster makes all the women fall in love with him. He can’t decide who to marry, so he marries the monster and they live happily ever after.
Explanation:
I hope this helped!
Answer:
The theme of the fable would be:
<em>Always remain humble and live within your means.</em>
<em></em>
This could be seen in the action done by the city mouse where he was boasting that he is living in riches rather than penury. He also never told his friend, country mouse that, the house was never his, thereby creating larger than life living lifestyle.
The best summary to support the theme is the statement made by the country mouse <em>"I'm off. You live in the lap of luxury, I can see, but you are surrounded by dangers; whereas at home I can enjoy my simple dinner of roots and corn in peace."</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
Topic: The decision to censor particular books is often tied to current political or social debates.
1. People are social media addicts. The internet is usually either plainly seen as republican or democratic views and they are expressed to you in a manner that you could actually believe what they are writing about. They attempt to reach into your own morals and values and convince you that you need to read a certain book - or that a book has things in it that would not be appropriate for you and your beliefs.
Hopefully, the students have a teacher, as myself, that will encourage them to read all the banned books that they can get their hands on. Even though most of all literature is somewhere on the web, I encourage you to purchase the banned books. Politically motivated censorship is usually someone trying to please the people. Give them what they want; in reality we do not want books to be banned. It is simple really, if you do not want to read it, then do not read it. Whatever is going on in the news, is usually somewhere in history and written about already. History repeats itself and it is evident that there are people that want to control what you think and what you say. They want to control people. There is no government for the people by the people any longer, if they continue to ban books. If we allow them to continue to ban books, this will trickle slowly into other areas of our lives. They start slow, and then they get into the media to try to sway people to believe a certain way.
Explanation:
Books - the ones you still can hold in your hand and read - will continue to disappear. People will try to control what you think, eat, believe and attempt to change your value system and your morals.
Fake news? possibly, but in reality, no on should ban books.
If you have not READ (not watched) Fahrenheit 451, I encourage you to do so. Read the book. If you choose to watch the movie, wait until you have read the book.
Answer:
I don’t agree with Lundstrom that it is inconsistent to deny privileges like voting and drinking to teenagers but then to sentence them as adults, setting the early age standards to allow teenagers to vote and drink is to connive them. People would never know what could a teenager do, their behaviors are erratic. But that doesn’t mean they would be free from trails, the title of “juveniles” does not indicate that they are
innocent in every situations, in certain circumstances, they should be tried as adults
Explanation:
