Which of these changes are planned and based on situations that are expected to arise?

Poe Company is considering the purchase of new equipment costing $80,000. The projected net cash flows are $35,000 for the first

sergey [27]

Answer:

$23,773.65

Explanation:

Net present value is the present value of after tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested

NPV can be calculated using a financial calculator :

cash flow in year 0 = $-80,000.

Cash flow in year 1 and 2 = $35,000.

Cash flow in year 3 and 4 = $30,000.

I = 10%

NPV = $23,773.65

To find the NPV using a financial calculator:

1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

3. Press compute

5 0

3 years ago

Performance Gloves, Inc. produces three sizes of sports gloves: small, medium and large.

lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

A.Pattern Department 57 per DLH

Cut and Sew Department 78 per DLH

B.Small glove 8.52

Medium glove 10.65

Large glove 12.78

Explanation:

a) Calculation to Determine the two production department factory overhead rates.

Pattern Department = 165,200/2,900

= 56.9 Approximately 57 per DLH

Cut and Sew Department = 273,000/3,500

= 78 per DLH

Therefore two production department factory overhead rates will be :

Pattern Department 57 per DLH

Cut and Sew Department 78 per DLH

b) Calculation of the factory overhead cost per unit

Small glove (57*.04+78*.08)=8.52

Medium glove (57*.05+78*.10)=10.65

Large glove (57*.06+78*.12)=12.78

Therefore the factory overhead per unit for each product will be: Small glove 8.52

Medium glove 10.65

Large glove 12.78

7 0

3 years ago

CIRP. Jason Smith is a foreign exchange trader with Citibank. He notices the following quotes. Spot exchange rate SFr1.6627/$ Si

Zinaida [17]

Answer:

Answer explained below

Explanation:

A.

For six months, rSFr => 1.50% and r$ => 1.75%.

Since the exchange rate is in SFr/$ terms, the appropriate expression for the interest rate parity relation is

F/S => [ (1 + rSFr ) / ( 1 + r$) ]

then we can also say

F/S *( 1 + r$) => (1 + rSFr )

Now Left side => F/S *( 1 + r$) => [ ( 1 + 6.558) / ( + 1.6627) ] * (1 +0.0175)

Left side => 1.0133

and Right side => (1 + rSFr ) => 1.0150

Since the left and right sides are not equal, IRP is not holding.

B and C.

Since IRP is not holding, there is an arbitrage possibility.

As 1.0133 < 1.0150,

we can say that the EuroSFr quote is more than what it should be as per the quotes for the other three variables. And, we can also say that the Euro$ quote is less than what it should be as per the quotes for the other three variables. Therefore, the arbitrage strategy should be based on borrowing in the Euro$ market and lending in the SFr market. The steps are as as follows. -

Borrow $1000000 for six-months at 3.5% per year and then we will pay back

=> $1000000 * (1 + 0.0175) => $1,017,500 six months later.

Convert $1000000 to SFr at the spot rate to get SFr 1662700.

Lend SFr 1662700 for six-months at 3% per year. Will get back

=> SFr1662700 * (1 + 0.0150) => SFr 1,687,641 six months later.

Sell SFr 1687641 six months forward. The transaction will be contracted as of the current date but delivery and settlement will only take place six months later. So, sixmonths later exchange

SFr 1,687,641 for => SFr 1687641 ⁄ SFr 1.6558/$ => $1,019,230.

The arbitrage profit six months later is 1019230 - 1017500 = $1,730

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is a correct description of the crowding-out effect of deficit spending?

borishaifa [10]

Answer:

the options are missing, so I looked for them:

a. The buying of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.

b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.

c. The selling of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.

d. The buying of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.

the answer is:

b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.

Explanation:

The crowding out effect happens when the government increases its spending level in order to engage in an expansionary fiscal policy but someone needs to pay for this extra spending. In order for the government to finance their spending, they have to choose to either increase taxes or issue more debt. When they issue more debt, they end up decreasing private investment since money that could be used by private companies is used by the government instead.

5 0

3 years ago

In a repeated game, deterring entry A. is not a rational strategy if money is lost fighting the first potential entrant. B. can

sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

D. May require losing money fighting the first potential entrant.

Explanation:

In this form of gaming, or in this game theory, it is said to be played over and over and could possible be in a probability form that is why that possibly, as a player, you may require loosing money fighting the first potential entrant.

Fighting the first entrant, possibility of cooperating means that their could be a possible compromise in order to carry on accepting a payoff over a certain period of time, knowing that if we do not uphold our end of the deal, our opponent may decide not to either.

3 0

3 years ago