Answer:
Is the best method of analyzing mutually exclusive projects.
Explanation:
Net present value is equal to the present value of all the future cash flows of a project, less the initial outlay of project.
Net present value analysis simply concluded about a project to be worth doing when it finds the present value of future cash flows greater than the initial investment and vice versa.
We just have to see which is higher, the present value of future cash flows or the initial investment.
It is assumed that an investment with a positive NPV will be profitable, and an investment with a negative NPV will result in a net loss.
Answer:
C) Louis has not accepted and there is no contract.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Laura offered to sell Louis a tract of land. The offer was complete and certain as to all material terms but the offer stated that a telegraphed acceptance was required. Within a reasonable time, Louis telephoned Laura to accept but this doesn't translate to acceptance because Louis has not done the needful to present or send a telegraphed acceptance.
Hence, in this situation, Louis has not accepted and there is no contract yet.
Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), an offer has been accepted only when Louis (the offeree) performs the requisite act by Laura (the offerer).
In this case of selling a tract of land, a telegraphed acceptance is the authorized and authentic means of communication of acceptance.
Additionally, a Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a legal principle, regulations and standard set of laws for transactions of business between two or more parties.
Answer:
differential rate.
Explanation:
A pay structure in which more efficient workers earn higher wages, as suggested by Frederick W. Taylor, is known as a differential rate system.
According to Frederick Winslow Taylor, a mechanical engineer and father of scientific management, some efficient workers may earn higher wage than their colleagues.
Answer:
currency offset
Explanation:
In simple words, An alternative means taking an opposing part in the stock markets in comparison to an initial starting position. In company, an offset may relate to the situation where damages arising from one business segment are compensated for by profits from another.
Within the financial markets, a investor joins an analogous, but contrary, contract to cover a futures contract that excludes the actual underlying delivery obligations. Thus, we can conclude that the given case illustrates offset settings.
Answer:
In the given case we need to tell the most correct option for the statements:
For Statement 1 = F Joint cost
Whenever two or more products are produced in the process by default without separation it is called joint cost.
For Statement 2 = B. Opportunity Cost
Opportunity Cost is not a cost and is the value of revenue forgone, for choosing the current opportunity.
For Statement 3 = C. Relevant Information
This refers to the future data as it is relevant for decision making, and will differ for each alternative.
For statement 4 = G. Sunk Cost
Sunk Cost is the cost which has already been incurred in the past and cannot be changed, or its impact will be same in no manner it can be avoided.
For Statement 5 = A. Target Full Product Costs
Under Target Full Product Cost the cost of a product from its very initial stage to the stage until its sold is calculated and called as target cost to be achieved.
