The paragraph that best develops Henry's character is when the narrator locate them on the way to Washington, describing him as:
<u>He had grown to regard himself merely as a part of a vast blue
</u>
<u>demonstration. His province was to look out, as far as he could, for his
</u>
<u>personal comfort. For recreation he could twiddle his thumbs and
</u>
<u>speculate on the thoughts which must agitate the minds of the generals.
</u>
<u>Also, he was drilled and drilled and reviewed, and drilled and drilled and
</u>
<u>reviewed.</u>
I'm kind of confused if your asking anybody to answer this for them selves personally or what but for me it's all of the above.
It depends on what adaptations you're looking at but I'd say some significant differences across the board are the portrayals of the monster. In the books, the monster can speak eloquently and read as well while he mostly grunts and struggles with words in the movie adaptations.
Answer:
"Similar" is the closest antonym for "varying".
