Answer:
We have the comparison below
Explanation:
1 2 3
Expenses for the year 20000 27000 34000
PVIF at 12% 0.89286 0.79719 0.71178
PV of expenses 17857 21524 24201
Cumulative PV of expenses 17857 39381 63582
EOY MV -1000 -1750 -2500
PV of MV -893 -1395 -1779
Total PW (4000+ PV of expenses - PV of MV) 22750 44776 69361
P/A 0.89286 1.69005 2.40183
EUAC 25480 26494 28879
$695 per adult
$347.50 per child under 18<span>
Maximum: $2,085</span>
Answer:
A) according to put call parity:
price of put option = call option - stock price + [future value / (1 + risk free rate)ⁿ]
put = $8.89 - $120 + [$120 / (1 + 8%)¹/⁴] = $8.89 - $120 +$117.71 = $6.60
B) you have to purchase both a put and call option ⇒ straddle
the total cost of the investment = $8.89 + $6.60 = $15.496, this way you can make a profit if the stock price increases higher than $120 + $6.60 = $126.60 or decreases below than $120 - $6.60 = $113.40
The size of the sample that must be used is 264. The correct sample size is 264. Read below about how to arrive at the sample size.
<h3>What is the sample size that must be used?</h3>
p′ = x / n where x represents the number of successes and n represents the sample size. The variable p′ is the sample proportion and serves as the point estimate for the true population proportion.
Then, it follows that,
p= 30/10 x 88 = 264
Therefore, the correct answer is 264.
learn more about population proportion: brainly.com/question/4300488
#SPJ11