1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shusha [124]
3 years ago
12

One reason that the government faced difficulty defending the Sherman Antitrust Act in court was because

History
2 answers:
Leona [35]3 years ago
6 0
One reason that the government faced difficulty defending the Sherman Antitrust Act in court was because many of the court officials were corrupt in the sense that they were colluding with the very businesses that were being charged. 
Genrish500 [490]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:the answer is A

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Complete the paragraph about the populist Party's position regarding railroads during the Gilded Age.
MAXImum [283]

The Populist party wanted the government to take over the railroads.

The Populist party mostly made up of farmers who had several grievances such as:

  • railroads overcharging them to transport their goods
  • the use of gold instead of silver to back the U.S. dollar
  • high charges on telegraph

In order to address these, they formed the Populist party where they called on the U.S. government to take over the railroads and telegraph wires so that the government would give them better rates.

In conclusion, the Populist party wanted more government interference so that they would be able to access the railroad and telegraph at cheaper rates.

<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/14451855.</em>

3 0
3 years ago
Which one of the following agreements stated that the lower house represented the people and the upper house represented the sta
Sonja [21]
The Great Compromise is the agreement that states that the <span>lower house represented the people and the upper house represented the states.  </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement explains a planned economy?
stellarik [79]

The first one is correct. In a planned economy, also known as a command economy, the state determines prices and allocates resources.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did jesus clear the temple of the money changers?
natulia [17]
Matthew 21:12-14 And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all of them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers, and the seats of them that sold doves,
   And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.
 
And the blind and the lame came to him in the temple; and he healed them.

  Jesus cleared the temple of money changers because the temple was the house of God, a holy, pure place, and the money changers were being dishonest and cheating people.
7 0
3 years ago
How did the fundamentalist revolt take place
sergey [27]

Answer: What was the fundamentalist revolt?

The protestants felt threatened by the decline of value and increase in visibility of Catholicism and Judaism. The Fundamentalists ended up launching a campaign to rid Protestant denominations of modernism and to combat the new individual freedoms that seemed to contradict traditional morals.

What caused fundamentalism?

The causes of Fundamentalism. Steve Bruce argues that the main causes of Fundamentalism are modernisation and secularisation, but we also need to consider the nature of the religions themselves and a range of 'external factors' to fully explain the growth of fundamentalist movements.

Fundamentalism, in the narrowest meaning of the term, was a movement that began in the late 19th- and early 20th-century within American Protestant circles to defend the "fundamentals of belief" against the corrosive effects of liberalism that had grown within the ranks of Protestantism itself. Liberalism, manifested in critical approaches to the Bible that relied on purely natural assumptions, or that framed Christianity as a purely natural or human phenomenon that could be explained scientifically, presented a challenge to traditional belief.

A multi-volume group of essays edited by Reuben Torrey, and published in 1910 under the title, The Fundamentals, was financed and distributed by Presbyterian laymen Lyman and Milton Stewart and was an attempt to arrest the drift of Protestant belief. Its influence was large and was the source of the labeling of conservatives as "fundamentalists."

Useful for looking at this history of fundamentalism are George Marsden's Fundamentalism and American Culture: The Shaping of Twentieth-Century Evangelicalism, 1870-1925 (New York: Oxford, 1980), Bruce B. Lawrence, Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt against the Modern Age (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1989), David Beale, In Pursuit of Purity: American Fundamentalism Since 1850 (Greenville: Unusual Publications, 1986), and Mark A. Noll, A History of Christianity in the United States and Canada (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1992).

Lately, the meaning of the word "fundamentalism" has expanded. This has happened in the press, in academia, and in ordinary language. It appears to be expanding to include any unquestioned adherence to fundamental principles or beliefs, and is often used in a pejorative sense. Nowadays we hear about not only Protestant evangelical fundamentalists, but Catholic fundamentalists, Mormon fundamentalists, Islamic fundamentalists, Hindu fundamentalists, Buddhist fundamentalists, and even atheist or secular or Darwinian fundamentalists.

Scholars of religion have perhaps indirectly contributed to this expansion of the term, as they have tried to look for similarities in ways of being religious that are common in various systems of belief. Between 1991 and 1995, religion scholars Martin Marty and Scott Appleby published a 5-volume collection of essays as part of "The Fundamentalism Project" at the University of Chicago, which is an example of this approach. Appleby is co-author of Strong Religion (2003), also from the University of Chicago Press that attempts to give a common explanatory framework for understanding anti-modern and anti-secular religious movements around the world.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why the Articles of Confederation did not work for the young America.
    5·1 answer
  • Which cruel realities regarding slavery does Douglass describe?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the name of the northernmost site of skeleton found in North America?
    6·1 answer
  • Answer both plzzz ASAP ASAP!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIESTTTT PLEASEEE HELPPP
    9·1 answer
  • Ví dụ về xuất khẩu tư bản tư nhân và xuất khẩu tư bản nhà nước
    10·1 answer
  • What are three important events that Martin Luther King was a historical figure in? like mention three important events in hist
    14·2 answers
  • Question 9 Which TWO ways does the Voting Rights Act of 1965 expand democracy in the United States? a. by not by ahswing certain
    6·1 answer
  • 5. How does a state bank differ from a national bank? (state bank, national bank, national currency)
    11·1 answer
  • Thomas Jefferson sent these men to try to purchase New Orleans from the French...
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!