The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Were the British justified in burning down the Senate building and White House as military targets or was it a totally unnecessary crime?
From the perspective of the British troops, the burning down of the White House was justified because the British knew that Washington was the center and a strategic place for the Americans. The British knew that these actions would diminish the morale of the inexperienced Army of the new nation.
The Senate and the White House had symbolic importance in the strategy of the British Army and their burning was seen as a key decision to capture the region.
Some authors and historians refer to the concept of total war, in which destroying the resources of the enemy are vital so they cannot use them to regroup.
This was not the case, but the British knew that they could hit hard on key public buildings in Washington D.C., trying to get a considerable advantage of this city and its connection to the River and its closeness to the coast.
They both the most green land and has biggest amount of land
It will help him decide where to put the park due to simple reasons such as you can not put a city park on top of a mountain or anywhere where this is already something their. City parks at least where I am from are larger so he would have to find a decent amount of land which the map would show, but he also want to pick somewhere where it is convenient for people to visit.
Answer:
Ok you see a dam uses energy of the movement from the water, right? Then the dam uses that energy to control the flow of that water but that's not it the dam can also generate amount of electricity that is being produced. Its kinda hard to put in human words but id assume looking at this picture would basically explain everything..
Explanation:
