Answer:
c. capacity lag strategy
Explanation:
Capacity lag strategy -
It refers to the strategy , where the capacity is added only when the firm is operated at the maximum capacity , due to the increase in the demand , is referred to as capacity lag strategy .
The method helps to reduce any wastage , and is a type of conservative strategy .
The method can sometimes lead to the loss of the potential buyers because of the low service .
Hence , from the given information of the question ,
The correct answer is c. capacity lag strategy .
The size and growth rate of the human population has changed in the past 200 years because reproduction rates have increased due to the large number of people in the world
Answer:
Conflict perspective.
Explanation:
This is curled or drafted from Karl Marks works which talks about causes an consequences of the elite or higher beings in the societies against the lower or those in the poorer levels.
Conflict theory talks about tensions and conflicts arising when resources, status, and power are unevenly distributed between groups in society and that these conflicts become the engine for social change. Here, power can be seen as control of material resources and accumulated wealth, control of politics and the institutions that make up society, and one's social status relative to others which are not only by class but by race, gender, sexuality, culture, and religion, among other things.
Answer:
B. Thirteenth Amendment
Explanation:
The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished slavery.
Well, this question cannot really be answered generally. It's a matter of judgement, and it's best judged for particular cases. The consideration of this depends on two factors:
what are the probable costs (in terms of human life, and the quality of human life) of the invasion? - it's important not to diminish these factors, as the assessments of casualties often tend to be lower than the actual numbers
how high is the risk of the alternative. Do we have a good, unbiased reason to believe that a spread of nuclear weapons (unchecked spread, or spread that gives reasons to worry. US has a lot of nuclear weapons, but since it's not planning to use them on other country, it wouldn't be justified to attach the US) will happen? what kind of conflict are we risking?
in any case, this is not an easy question, and perhaps there will never be a good answer for it.
