Hohokam and Anasazi, grew corn,beans and squash
The answer is option "<span>c. freudian slip".
A Freudian slip refers to a blunder in discourse, memory, or physical activity that is translated as happening because of the impedance of an oblivious stifled wish or interior line of reasoning. The idea is a piece of traditional psychoanalysis.It alludes to something you think unwittingly, and after that say it, without acknowledging what it really implies.
</span>
The Sixth and Seventh Amendments
<h3>What are the Sixth and Seventh Amendments?</h3>
With some limitations, the Constitution's Sixth and Seventh Amendments protect the right to a jury trial in criminal and civil cases. Criminal and civil cases each have a different rights to a jury trial.
<h3>What does the civil jury trial right entail?</h3>
The right to a jury trial is not something that the 7th Amendment ensures in every case. The right to a jury trial in civil proceedings is based on the amount at issue between the parties. States may have courts with special jurisdictions that don't allow jury trials and set a cap on the amount in dispute. However, either party may choose to file the action in a superior court with wide jurisdiction, where a jury trial is an option, if the parties choose a jury trial. In this manner, the right of each party to a jury trial remains unrestricted. In the event of a disagreement, parties may also agree in a contract to waive their right to a jury trial.
<h3>What does the right to a jury trial in criminal cases entail?</h3>
All prosecutions are granted the right to a jury trial under the 6th Amendment. A jury trial must be available in criminal matters when a party faces the possibility of incarceration, according to the Due Process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. A jury trial is frequently not permitted in cases involving very minor criminal offenses that just carry fines and no risk of imprisonment. A speeding ticket, for instance, might not grant a party the right to a jury trial.
Learn more about the Sixth and Seventh Amendments here:
brainly.com/question/10374838
#SPJ4
Answer:
Statement is true.
Explanation:
In simple words Pluralism is defined as the system or condition under which two or more groups, principles, states, etc., coexist. Under the concept there exist a doctrine of multiplicity and there is no dominant set of organization present which directs the policy making processes.
Given statement is correct because it is this concept of Pluralism which provide an individual or interest group an effective way to participate in the political system and allowing theirs view and ideas to be heard in an organised manner. According to pluralist, negotiation and discussion among these interest groups further provide a balance of power which also protects an individual from inclining towards any specific ideology or view point and helps them to remain neutral.
Hope this will help.
I have mixed feelings about it. The Indian Act, which was enacted in 1876 and has since been amended, allows the government to control most aspects of aboriginal life: Indian status, land, resources, wills, education, band administration and so on. Inuit and Métis are not governed by this law.
