The local maximum is the bump around x=1.4 so
Answer: [1,2]
Answer:
No, the weight loss program doesn't have statistical significance.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that in a study of a weight loss program, 7 subjects lost an average of 41 lbs.
It is found that there is about a 40% chance of getting such results with a diet that has no effect.
Firstly, statistical significance means that the event is sure to be happen and there is a proper statistical calculation behind it.
But here it is stated that there is a 40% chance of getting such results with a diet that has no effect which means that the event is unlikely to happen by chance and it is just a prediction so, the weight loss program is not statistically significant.
Now, practically significant means that there is a large difference in the subjects being tested.
Here, the weight loss program is considered to be practically significant because there is a large amount of weight loss of 43 lbs of the subjects which is a large amount.
The Gauss-Jordan elimination method different from the Gaussian elimination method in that unlike the Gauss-Jordan approach, which reduces the matrix to a diagonal matrix, the Gauss elimination method reduces the matrix to an upper-triangular matrix.
<h3>
What is the Gauss-Jordan elimination method?</h3>
Gauss-Jordan Elimination is a technique that may be used to discover the inverse of any invertible matrix as well as to resolve systems of linear equations.
It is based on the following three basic row operations that one may apply to a matrix: Two of the rows should be switched around. Multiply a nonzero scalar by one of the rows.
Learn more about Gauss-Jordan elimination method:
brainly.com/question/12090959
#SPJ1
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
ok so first u have to multiply 9x5 which is 45 and put it under the 5
then u multiply 3x5 which is 15 and u put it under the 5 next to the 3
u do the samething over and over, is just basically time tables