Answer:
A
Explanation:
i only did this for points, dont take it seriously
Answer:
Issue one: The government should not have the right to issue a higher tax on carbonated drinks/soda to discourage teen obesity because it would be not alter the demand for these types of products. Say for example we use the supply, demand, quantity and price model, supply and quantity are unaffected in this model, whilst price goes up. When the price goes up, this would be an example of where demand does not decrease since the price would not deter people from purchasing it. With the amount of sodas that have to be regulated and how common they are to the everyday life, it'd be a waste of time. Furthermore, it is not the responsibility of the government to regulate personal choices done by the customers, it is their own choice if they choose to be healthy or not.
Issue two: The government does not have the right to monitor our actions on the internet to keep the nation safe from terrorism. The internet is a free market, a public entity supplied by public cooperations and access given by ISPs. The government's jurisdiction does not give them permission to monitor the internet as it could possibly fall under a violation of the fourth amendment. The ISPs, social media networks, and any other cooperation has the right to monitor actions as it'd be written out and agreed by the user in their terms of service, the government should not have involvement, only their intervention is required when a report is filed.
Issue three: The government should be allowed to outlaw texting while driving since it is a hazard to personal safety and the safety of others. The roads in the United States of America are mostly public, and texting while driving impairs the user's ability to react to incoming situations, whilst taking their focus off the road. Similar to drinking while driving, it only becomes an issue when the safety of others aside from your self is put at risk. In which case, I do believe the government has the right to outlaw texting while driving to keep drivers safer on the road.
Explanation:
The French Revolution established the precedent of democratic government. It also established liberal social tenants of equality to all citizens, basic social rights, and separation of the church.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles
Explanation:
it is nobler to die with integrity then to live with principles that harm other strongly support the statement that men with integrity does not compromise with his principles he is self made person and he believes in his abilities and work on his own principles on the other side a man who compromises on his principles usually lacks confidence and is not capable enough to believe on his own abilities and is not able to make decisions on his own on the other side a man with integrity confidence is capable enough to even handle difficult of situation and can manage every problem very well as this phrase is mostly quoted in most of the texts
REBECCA NURSE a famous religious author also quoted as same that "It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles that harm others" being a religious and follower of GOD she came on to the conclusion that in living with integrity is that what matters
Find the current
Formula V=IR —> I = V/R
V= 10V, I = 2Ω
—> I = 10V/ 2Ω = 5A
So, the current is 5A
