That statement is False
President Jhonson was not the originator of the civil rights legislation that eventually passed by congress, it was originated by President Kennedy
Answer:
The answer is that separate facilities for white and black people was constitutional as long as the facilities were equal.
Explanation:
Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in American constitutional law that justified systems of segregation.
Under this doctrine, services, facilities and public accommodations were allowed to be separated by race, on the condition that the quality of each group’s public facilities was to remain equal.
Although the Constitutional doctrine required equality, the facilities and social services offered to African-Americans were almost always of lower quality than those offered to white Americans.
The doctrine of “separate but equal” was legitimized in the 1896 Supreme Court case, Plessy v. Ferguson.
Three because it shows one branch "checking" another by
Answer:
high school of the dead
higurashi when they cry
ghost hunt
shiki
mirai nikki
Explanation:
that is all i can think of
Answer:
The main difference between Federalists and Anti-Federalists at the time of the ratification of the Constitution of the United States was in the powers that the federal government would have compared to those of the states.
Thus, the Federalists defended the idea of a strong and comprehensive federal government, as described in the articles of the Constitution. In turn, the Anti-Federalists feared that this strong government could trample on the rights of citizens and state governments, thus fighting for the adoption of amendments that would guarantee these rights: the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, all writing that promoted a broad federal government and with great prerogatives would be Federalist, while all writing that defended the rights and powers of the states in particular would be Anti-Federalist.
