1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
4 years ago
11

What most directly describes the growth of cities

History
2 answers:
mixer [17]4 years ago
7 0
"Urbanization" <span>most directly describes the growth of cities.</span>
BabaBlast [244]4 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is B) urbanization.

The other options of the question were A) segregation. C) industrialization. D) commercialization.

What most directly describes the growth of cities is urbanization.

Urbanization is the process in which cities are becoming larger and more populated due to government and private companies invest in better highways, tollways, the construction of modern buildings to rent spaces for offices, fabrics, parks, malls, shopping centers, and many more amenities that attract people from rural areas or small towns because here they can find better job opportunities and living conditions.

You might be interested in
An agreement to count slaves as 3/5 of a person was related to
IrinaK [193]
Three fifths compromise
3 0
4 years ago
What was the nuclear family
Whitepunk [10]
A nuclear family is a group of people that consists of the father, mother and children
7 0
3 years ago
Which statement about Robert E. Lee's surrender at Appomattox is NOT true?
MrMuchimi
B. Grant refused Lee’s sword upon surrender.
5 0
3 years ago
Claim: Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence.
Mila [183]

Answer:

A. Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation.

Explanation:

Considering the claim stated in the question, hence, among the following options, the statement that could be used as evidence in support of the claim that "Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence." is option A "Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation."

This is because a CLOSE PROXIMITY between Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand means these countries or colonies have a good rapport with Great Britain. Therefore, it was easier to negotiate their independence instead of going to war (for example USA) or series of agitation and protest to get their independence (for example India)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What continents are not part of the old world?
trapecia [35]
North America and south America 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which contribution from international organizations to fight disease is most necessary?
    15·1 answer
  • What is the minor premise that makes this syllogism true?
    9·1 answer
  • describe the similarities and differences between the new American immigrants and Protestant workers.
    10·2 answers
  • The Russian revolution turned Russia into which kind of government
    5·2 answers
  • How did the Gold Rush affect California’s population?
    12·1 answer
  • What was a major result of Henry Fords innovative manufacturing techniques?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes southern society in the mid 1800s?
    6·2 answers
  • In early africa, kings were responsible for___
    9·1 answer
  • 5. Following the end of Reconstruction, African-American people living in the South became increasingly disillusioned as they fa
    7·1 answer
  • 33. Who had more power in Ancient Egypt? Upper Kingdom or Lower Kingdom and why?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!