1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
const2013 [10]
3 years ago
8

How can something be a contribution to the past and the present

History
1 answer:
andreyandreev [35.5K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: A Contribution is Something that Creates a Common Understanding and Helps Contribute to Society in Some Form.

Explanation:

History is like a puzzle, it helps create long term effects and short term effects that can help solve the puzzle. An artifact, a revolutionary scientific experiment, or a discovery, etc, can be a contribution to the past and the present. <em>It can both have long term and short term effects. It helps society understand more about the past and how that something may have helped the past.</em> Let's say that there was an ancient civilization, there wasn't much evidence that this civilization lived. Let's say hypothetically, a research team found an important discovery like a child's toy that shaped history and created a domino-like effect as to why that civilization impacted our culture/community today. The toy helped create entertainment for civilization. The toy from that civilization helps us understand and think about when/where the civilization could have lived, were they an advanced civilization, did they have their own society or tribe, were they advanced enough to understand the concepts of entertainment and fun? That's the kind of thing that makes something a contribution. Discoveries can also provide evidence of something like cold cases. Let's say we found out who/what exposed Anne Frank's family, that would impact the past and the present. That would be a major contribution because it would be the solution to a decades-long mystery and it would help bring justice to the family. Another example, what if scientists found in an alternate planet where an advanced society lived? Like Homo-Sapiens lived, that would impact both past and present due to the formation of the planet and if it provides answers to how our planet formed. It would also be an important discovery for future research. <em>Much of history is a contribution to the past and the present. *This might be my understanding*</em>

You might be interested in
The blue line on the map represents what major river
cluponka [151]
I think that the answer is the nile river
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did women have so few rights during the antebellum period?
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:n the era of revivalism and reform, American understood the family and home as the hearthstones of civic virtue and moral influence. This increasingly confined middle-class white women to the domestic sphere, where they were responsible for educating children and maintaining household virtue. Yet women took the very ideology that defined their place in the home and managed to use it to fashion a public role for themselves. As a result, women actually became more visible and active in the public sphere than ever before. The influence of the Second Great Awakening, coupled with new educational opportunities available to girls and young women, enabled white middle-class women to leave their homes en masse, joining and forming societies dedicated to everything from literary interests to the antislavery movement.

In the early nineteenth century, the dominant understanding of gender claimed that women were the guardians of virtue and the spiritual heads of the home. Women were expected to be pious, pure, submissive, and domestic, and to pass these virtues on to their children. Historians have described these expectations as the “Cult of Domesticity,” or the “Cult of True Womanhood,” and they developed in tandem with industrialization, the market revolution, and the Second Great Awakening. In the early nineteenth century, men’s working lives increasingly took them out of the home and into the “public sphere.” At the same time, revivalism emphasized women’s unique potential and obligation to cultivate Christian values and spirituality in the “domestic sphere.” There were also real legal limits to what women could do outside of it. Women were unable to vote, men gained legal control over their wives’ property, and women with children had no legal rights over their offspring. Additionally, women could not initiate divorce, make wills, or sign contracts. Women effectively held the legal status of children.

Because the evangelical movement prominently positioned women as the guardians of moral virtue, however, many middle-class women parlayed this spiritual obligation into a more public role. Although prohibited from participating in formal politics such as voting, office holding, and making the laws that governed them, white women entered the public arena through their activism in charitable and reform organizations. Benevolent organizations dedicated to evangelizing among the poor, encouraging temperance, and curbing immorality were all considered pertinent to women’s traditional focus on family, education, and religion. Voluntary work related to labor laws, prison reform, and antislavery applied women’s roles as guardians of moral virtue to address all forms of social issues that they felt contributed to the moral decline of society. As antebellum reform and revivalism brought women into the public sphere more than ever before, women and their male allies became more attentive to the myriad forms of gender inequity in the United States.

5 0
3 years ago
When referring to the Whiskey Rebellion Washington said, "we may bid adieu to all government in this Country, except Mob and Clu
Gnom [1K]

Answer:

Washington is saying that people should not be uprising against the government for taxing the whiskey because they were the ones who elected the representatives that made these laws

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
mr_godi [17]
The idea for the removal of Native Americans was first brought up by Thomas Jefferson, who wanted the natives to willingly leave the colonies. The act gave Jackson the authority to offer the native nation's land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their eastern lands. It also provided money for the law to be carried out.  When some tribes refused to sign the treaties, they used physical force to remove them, hence the Trail of Tears.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A main reason the Age of Revolutions failed to achieve widespread change in Europe was
jolli1 [7]

Revolts were poorly organized!

 Most successful revolutions take place in countries that are almost free. Revolutions tend to just replace the former monarch or dictator with a new monarch or dictator.

Hope I helped. :)

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • most people who watched the first televised presidential debate in 1960 believed that _____________ won. a. dwight d. eisenhower
    15·2 answers
  • Small businesses, like independent bookstores, have been hurt most by what?
    11·2 answers
  • The Dust Bowl described what Great Depression situation?
    12·1 answer
  • During World War II US naval forces were able tointercept the Japanese fleet before it reaches midway because
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the elastic clause debated​
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the historical circumstances that led to the crusades
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I'LL GIVE BRAINLIST AND LOTS OF POINTS
    5·1 answer
  • How did art change during the Enlightenment period?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of a company increasing its market penetration? A. Taking customers away from competitors B
    9·2 answers
  • Pope Urban ll is important in Catholic history because he
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!