<span>This study of Professor Perlman comparing the textbooks to determine which one used more sexist language than the other by counting the number of gender references in the books is called as manifesting content coding. This comparative study helped him to come to a conclusion which book is more sexist.</span>
Answer:
Nature and Nurture
Explanation:
Both Trevor and Bill have undergone similar treatment in their childhood; while Trevor took it as positive to redeem himself Bill remained in the quagmire of negativity, never forgot the abuses against him and decided to pay back in the same coin. It was the nature of Trevor that allowed him to challenge the problem by nurturing himself towards a better life. Trevor learnt a lesson out of abuses inflicted upon him that he would help those underwent similar treatment. It was Bill's nature upon which childhood abuses helped nurture even more vices. While Trevor continued to recall the abuses meted out to him for the betterment, Bill liked to forget it via drugs and idleness. While nature and nurture transformed Trevor to be a better person, it put Bill in the worse condition.
Functionalist sociological perspective emphasizes the role of reference groups in setting and enforcing standards of conduct and belief
<u>Explanation:</u>
The society is tied together by social accord, in which parts of the society accept upon, and act collectively to succeed, what is most beneficial for society as a unity is the view of Functionalists. It does not support bodies to get an effective part in shifting their social circumstances, yet when such modification may avail them.
This procedure resembles society within a macro-level familiarization, which is a deep focus on the cultural edifices that mold community as a quantity and views at both social formation and social roles.
The correct answer would be B.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The investigator should discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drugs and the drugs that are commercially available drug and then allow the subject so that he can decide whether to withdraw form the ongoing research to take the new drug.
Explanation:
When the 46-year man enrolled in the Phase III study of the drug. When the research was going on a new drug became available in the market in that case the investigators should discuss the benefits and the drawbacks of the investigational drug and the other drug that is commercially available then let the subject decide whether to keep on the research or not.
