Answer:
Job description.
Explanation:
A job description is an internal document that a firm draws up to describe the responsiblities of a position, the required skill, and job requirements to perform a particular job role.
When a job description is well crafted it shows clearly what is required to hire a person for a job. This will reduce discrimination lawsuits because it will show clearly why a particular candidate was disqualified from the hiring process.
For example if a candidate was disqualified for not having a bachelor's degree, it should be well stated in the job description to avoid discrimination claims.
Answer:
<u>c. $2,018.00</u>
Explanation:
Lower of cost or market is the inventory valuation method which requires to record the inventory at a value lower of
- Initial cost of inventory ( Manufacturing cost or Purchasing cost )
- Market value of the Inventory ( Net realizable value of the market )
Product__Quantity__Cost per unit__Market per unit___ Lower ____Value
Jelly _____150 ______$2.00 ______2.15___________ $2.00____ $300
Jam _____ 370 _____ $2.65 ______2.50 __________ $2.50 ____ $925
Marmalade 260 _____ $3.10 ______3.05 __________ $3.05 ____ $793
Total Value ___________________________________________<u>$2,018</u>
Answer: Macro, External
Explanation:
Macroeconomics effect the entire world, while it scrutinizes the external forces that affect the company.
Answer:
mid-calorie soft drinks such as Pepsi Next (2012) have not been successful in the past.
Explanation:
The new Pespsi true is a great product that offers the advantage of having the same flavor as Pepsi but lower calorie content of only 60 calories. This should sell well with consumers that are looking for lower calorie options.
However if there was a similar product like Pepsi True called Pepsi Next in 2012 that was mid-calories and was not successful, this could be a show stopper. People's perceptions of Pepsi Next will affect Pepsi True as they will feel it is just a repackaged Pepsi Next.
This will most likely lead to failure of the product similar to what happened with Pepsi Next.
Answer:
The Supreme Court decided that the use of prayers to open government meetings in 2014 is constitutional and that such meetings can hold, even if it clearly favors one faith, provided that there is no attempt to harass, intimidate, or coerce other religion believers.
