Answer:
B. to explain how two new programs would provide recovery and relief
Explanation:
i just did a activity on it
Look out for killer phrases that start with “That’s a good idea, but…”
<span>It’s against company policyIt’s not practicalIt’s not necessaryWe don’t have the resourcesIt will cost too muchWe’ve never done it that wayOur customers (or vendors) won’t like itIt needs more studyIt’s not part of your jobLet’s make a survey firstLet’s sit on it for a whileThat’s not our problemThe boss won’t go for itThe old timers won’t use itIt’s too hard to administerWhy hasn’t someone else suggested it before?Let’s form a committeeWe should wait until the economy improvesWho else has tried it?<span>Is it best practice?</span></span>
Answer:
1 and 5
Explanation:
The image of the different rocks are attached. From the image attached, it can be seen that rock 1 and rock 5 have a fine grained texture.
Fine grained rocks are formed from volcanic eruptions. During these eruptions, the molten magma is cooled fast at or close to the earth surface thereby forming rocks with a fine grained texture. The rock has fine grains because the crystals are small because of the fast cooling of the molten magma. Slow cooling causes the crystals to be large thereby forming coarse rocks such as rocks 2, 3 and 4.
Answer:
A. Life without parole.
Explanation:
Texas is one of the 31 states who offer life without parole as an option for some offenders. It basically means that they have to stay in prison for the rest of their life, without a chance to get on a parole.This resulted in less sentences to the death penalty, by lethal injection. This is most commonly used for hard cases of murder, or sexual abuses. Some justify this decision with the argument that the offender has no potential for rehabilitation and to successfully once again become a functioning part of a society.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The case about which the question is referring to is Griswold v. Connecticut.
The Griswold v. Connecticut was the case in which Estelle Griswold, an Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut and Dr C. Lee Buxton opened a clinic to counsel the married couples educating and counselling them about preventing contraception.
In Connecticut, the use of contraception or giving counselling about the same was a punishable offence with a fine of $50. Griswold and Buxton had challenged this law of Connecticut and were arrested with a fine. After there case being upheld in Appellate Division Court and Connecticut Supreme Court, Griswold appealed her case in the Supreme Court of the United States in 1965. In the same year, the Supreme Court gave a verdict in favour of Griswold based on the 14th Amendment of the Due Process which gives a right to privacy.
So, the answer is true.
