The following rights which were oppressed in American Colonies
- Colonists were likewise furious at being denied the right to a trial by jury.
- Many viewed the tax as an infringement of the rights of Englishmen, which contemporary opinion held to be enshrined in Magna Carta.
- Protests throughout the colonies threatened tax collectors with violence.
What three rights do the colonists claim are theirs?
The declaration states, “We hold those Truths to be self-evident, that every one guys are created identical, that they are endowed by their creator with positive unalienable Rights, that among those are life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness….”
Who do the colonists believe have abused their human rights?
The colonies have suffered 27 at the hands of the King George III. each of these abuses has been directed at the colonies for the cause of establishing a tyrannical government in North America.
Learn more about colonies brainly.com/question/13673860
#SPJ9
Answer:Direct election is a system of choosing political officeholders in which the voters directly cast ballots for the persons, or political party that they desire to see elected. ... By contrast, in an indirect election, the voters elect a body which in turn elects the officeholder in question.
Explanation:
Political differences created distrust among the Whites and prevented them from cooperating effectively with one another, some Whites insisted on restoring the czarist regime, others believed that only a more liberal and democratic program had only chance of success, and the Whites, then, had no common goal. The communists, in contrast, had a single-minded sense of purpose.
hope this helps ^-^
Yes,
oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid. In the
political philosophy of Aristotle, "
aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors. In Aristotle's political thought, an
"oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy. But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.) Today,
we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
The spread of Christianity was made a lot easier by the efficiency of the Roman Empire, but its principles were sometimes misunderstood and membership of the sect could be dangerous.
<span>Although </span>Jesus<span> had died, his message had not. Word of his teachings spread to Jewish communities across the empire. </span><span> <span>
Early Christians<span>The spread of Christianity was made a lot easier by the efficiency of the Roman Empire, but its principles were sometimes misunderstood and membership of the sect could be dangerous. </span>
Although Jesus had died, his message had not. Word of his teachings spread to Jewish communities across the empire. This was helped by energetic apostles, such as Paul and by the modern communications of the Roman Empire.
<span>Spreading the word </span>
Over 30 years, Paul clocked up around 10,000 miles, traveling across the Roman Empire. He preached in some of the empire’s most important cities. Although places like Ephesus, Philippi, Corinth and Athens looked magnificent, they were also home to tens of thousands of poor, desperate people who were the perfect audience for the Christian message of eternal life.
Like Jesus, Paul spoke to people in their homes and synagogues. But he went beyond Jesus, who had only preached to Jews. Paul believed his message should also be taken to gentiles – the non-Jews.
</span></span>
