Answer:
-
Rivalry between competitors
- Bargaining power of suppliers
- Bargaining power of customers
- Threat of new competitors
Explanation:
The factors chosen to identify whether or not a sector presents a good business opportunity for a company, were the strengths of Porter, who analyzes the micro and macro environment to determine whether a company can be competitive in the market.
The rivalry between competitors is an essential factor to measure the degree of opportunity for a business to be successful, as this factor will determine different variables among competitors of similar products in the market, such as the strength of the brand, the demand for your product, etc. in order to measure how this factor will directly impact your business.
The bargaining power of suppliers implies the bargaining power of the supplier with the company, being able to provide favorable or unfavorable conditions to a business, such as price, delivery time, quality, etc.
The bargaining power of buyers means measuring and monitoring how your product will have a positive or negative weight on the customer and which affects the volume of purchases, the possibility of the customer negotiating with the company, etc.
And the threat of new competitors concerns new competitors that can enter the market and directly impact their business, for this the barriers to entry such as legislation, high entry capital, etc. should be analyzed.
Answer:
command, market, and mixed
Answer:
$20,700
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Net Income = $25,100
Cash Provided by Operations = $32,500
Cash Sales = $64,600
Capital Expenditures = $9,600
Dividends Paid = $2,200
Now,
Swifty’ Free cash flow
= Cash Provided by Operations - Capital Expenditures - Dividends Paid
Thus,
Swifty’ Free cash flow = $32,500 - $9,600 - $2,200
or
Swifty’ Free cash flow = $20,700
Options :
a. mistake.
b. opinion.
c. an adhesion contract.
d. fraud.
Answer: Fraud
Explanation: From the scenario described above, it could be inferred that Ken, the real estate agent used trickery to lure Lily into purchasing the property. Hence, Lily could be said to have been defrauded by Ken who used what Lily needed to trick her into making the purchase because the main specification, that is high traffic, which Ken used to lure Lily was actually false. Fraud remains a grave offence as it could only be carried out by lying, issuing false statement, blackmail, impersonation and other grave offences.
Answer:
inelastic demand
Explanation:
Price elasticity of demand (PED) measures the proportional change in quantity demanded when the price of a product or service changes:
- when a 1% decrease in price, increases quantity demanded in a smaller proportion, the PED is said to be inelastic.
- when a 1% decrease in price, increases quantity demanded in a larger proportion, the PED is said to be elastic.
- when a 1% decrease in price, increases quantity demanded in the same proportion, the PED is said to be unit elastic.
In this case, the decrease in price (-2%) barely increased the quantity demanded, therefore, the PED is inelastic.
