Which outcome could be considered a cost of voting?

History

2 answers:

ELEN [110]2 years ago

6 0

for plato users the answer is Voting can be time consuming.

GrogVix [38]2 years ago

4 0

<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the best option would be "opportunity cost", since the time spent voting could potentially be spent doing something else. </span></span>

You might be interested in

Art in ancient Greece shows the importance of

Grace [21]

Answer:

Explanation:

Ancient Greece Art emphasized the importance and accomplishments of being human beings.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

History help me answer all pls

likoan [24]

Can't see it so I can't help

3 0

3 years ago

What difference in colonial policy is shown by the two passages? Spain insisted on royal control of colonies; England experiment

Elina [12.6K]

Answer:

I think it is c but I'm not sure.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Help please!!!!!!

jonny [76]

Elizabeth Cady Stanton-
A women’s rights activist who drafted the Declaration Sentiments

Susan B. Anthony- A Quaker and women’s rights activist who voted illegally in the 1872 presidential election ...............

Fredrick Douglass Lucretia- A charismatic minister who also organized the first women’s rights convention

William Lloyd Garrison- A leading abolitionist who spoke in favor of the resolution on women’s suffrage at the Seneca Falls Convention ...................
Mott Lucy Stone

5 0

2 years ago

Define the 16th Amendment how did it help the government

Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer:

The 16th Amendment to the constitution to the United States of America was passed in 1909 in the Congress. The Amendment was ratified by the states on February 3,1913. The 16th Amendment gave the government the right to levy an income tax without appointing it in the states on the basis of population. Before the Amendment the only revenue income of federal government used to come from tariffs rather than income taxes. However this amendment was a response to the Pollock vs Farmer loans co. Upon the case the Court ruled that the federal tax is not unconstitutional but government can not levy any tax without appointing the states on the basis of population.

As a result it was a barrier for the Congress to levy. But the 16th Amendment gave constitutional right to the government to levy taxes without appointing the states basis on the population.

This is how the 16th amendment helped the government.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago