It means to be concerned about accuracy and detail
Patriarchy is the answer✌
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
The answer is argument. :)
Answer:
a)
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the cognitive limitations preventing her from making an optimal decision are according to the Bounded Rationality framework. This is the idea that when making a decision, rationality is limited by the information that each individual has, the amount of time they have to make the decision, and also the cognitive limitations that the individual has.