1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lions [1.4K]
2 years ago
12

Suppose Megan gets a sales bonus at her place of work that gives her an extra $400 of disposable income. She chooses to spend $3

00 and save the remaining $100. From this, you can tell that Megan's marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is ________, and her marginal propensity to save (MPS) is ________.
Business
1 answer:
kicyunya [14]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

0.75, 0.25

Explanation:

With an increase in disposable income marginal propensity to consume increase. Similarly, with an increase in disposable income marginal propensity to save increases. Marginal propensity to save is the amount of money saved or kept after a fraction increase in overall disposable income.

MPC = 300/400=0.75

MPS = 100/400=0.25

Marginal propensity to consume is 0.75

Marginal propensity to save is 0.25

You might be interested in
A $1 per unit tax levied on consumers of a good is equivalent to
Katen [24]

Based on accounting principles, a $1 per unit tax levied on consumers of a good is equivalent to "a $1 per unit tax levied on producers of the good."

This is based on the idea that the market reaches the exact equilibrium price irrespective of who is accountable for paying the money to the government.

In other words, when the government levies a tax on a good, producers are not exempted from the tax levy because that money will be recouped from the producers' sales or revenue.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that tax on goods is inevitable to consumers and producers.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/22680521

7 0
2 years ago
Which factor makes a currency more attractive to investors
Anna007 [38]
The correct answer is B. A low inflation rate! I hope this helps you!
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anthony Roofing's budgeted manufacturing costs for 50,000 squares of shingles are: Fixed manufacturing costs $30,000 Variable ma
liberstina [14]

Answer:

Total budgeted manufacturing cost = $824,000

Explanation:

The total budgeted manufacturing cost is the sum of the variable  and fixed manufacturing cost

The fixed manufacturing cost of $30,000 would be absorbed (i.e charged to the units produced using overhead absorption rate (OAR).

OAR = Budgeted fixed manufacturing cost / Budgeted production squares

      = $30,000 /  50,000 squares = $0.6 per square

Absorbed fixed manufacturing cost= OAR × actual production of squares

Absorbed fixed manufacturing cost=  $0.6 × 40,000 = $24,000

Variable manufacturing cost = $20.00 × 40,000 =800,000

Total budgeted manufacturing cost = $24,000  + $800,000  = $824,000

Total budgeted manufacturing cost = $824,000

5 0
3 years ago
Which one of the following statements is TRUE? a. Company sponsorship of a local charity is an example of a nonpecuniary benefit
mojhsa [17]

Answer: c. An inside director is a board member who also holds a managerial position in the company

Explanation:

Inside Directors are indeed Board members who are employees/ hold managerial positions in the company.

They are in a unique position to help the board in Corporate Governance because as they are on the ground, they have specialized knowledge of the company and as such can provide complete information to the Board.

They typically include a Company's top executives such as the CEO, CFO and the COO.

5 0
3 years ago
During 20X0, Pard Corp. sold goods to its 80%-owned subsidiary, Seed Corp. At December 31, 20X0, one-half of these good were inc
wolverine [178]

Answer:

The amount to be repot is $1,450,000

Explanation:

in this question, we are asked to calculate the amount of selling expenses to be recorded in the company’s consolidated income statement for that year.

To answer this question, we employ a mathematical approach;

Mathematically;

Selling expenses = Total expenses - Contra Expenses

from the question, we identify that total expenses is (1,100,000 + 400,000) = $1,500,000

Contra expenses = $50,000

The selling expenses is thus; 1,500,000 - 50,000 = $1,450,000

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose a business can sell x gadgets for p(x)=250 - 0.01x dollars a piece, and it costs the business c(x) = 1,000 + 25x dollars
    15·2 answers
  • Should Andrew Jackson be<br>removed from the $20 Bill?<br><br>​
    6·2 answers
  • A new packaging machine will cost $57,000. The existing machine can be sold for $5,000 now and the new machine for $7,500 after
    5·1 answer
  • Frank age 63 is single and provided all of the support for his daughter Anna age 24 and her son Marvin age 6. Neither Anna nor M
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a benefit of content marketing? Select one: a. You reach more buyers at a lower cost. b. You essential
    11·1 answer
  • In an economy with population growth at rate n, the change in capital stock per worker is given by the equation:_______.
    15·1 answer
  • How would you expect an increase in the price of a good to<br> affect its demand curve?
    11·1 answer
  • When rent control pushes the price of apartments below the market equilibrium, then everyone who would like a rent-controlled ap
    10·2 answers
  • You can also improve your messages through stylistic emphasis in sentence structure and word choice. Which of the following styl
    11·1 answer
  • First month plus a security deposit is an example of this operating expense.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!