The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the options for this question.
However, trying to help you we can comment based on our knowledge of the topic.
Based on this description, the category in which Country X could most reliably be placed is "hybrid regime."
This is a strange political regime that combines autocratic and dictatorial forms of government with some traits of democracy. The corrupt government allows for elections so people can participate in this to elect the President and their representatives, but not always respect the results of the election if the winner is not the candidate that favors the interests of the people in power.
Answer:
Land use has a major impact on the water quality of both surface and ground water. Land use refers to the human use of the land. ... Certain kinds of land use can change the hydrology of the Watershed, altering the way water and pollutants move through the drainage basin.
Explanation:
<span>False. You should always wear a lifejacket on a boat, unless you are on a cruise ship or a ferry, because you never know when you might get into danger and end up in the water, for example if the boat capsizes.</span>
Betty's ability to adapt effectively in the face of threats to development is known as resilience. The term resilience is used to describe <span>the capacity to recover quickly from difficulties. It denotes toughness.
</span><span>The fact that Betty is successful, happy and satisfied despite the circumstances she grew in, means that she is capable of adapting well and overcome problems and threats. </span>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a court case that resided with William Marbury being appointed by John Adams, but during the process of his commission, Thomas Jefferson became president, and he and Secretary of State James Madison, added new courts and new judges. William Marbury's commission was not delivered to him, therefore petitioning to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the delivery of his commission.
The Court found Madison's refusal to deliver commissions was illegal but did not grant Marbury a writ of mandamus. Instead, the court held that Marbury did not have the right, under the Judiciary Act of 1789, to claim to the Supreme Court that Madison's act was unconstitutional.
The court knew that a writ of mandamus would be the proper way to fix the situation, but concluded that the court couldn't issue it. Therefore making it clear that Congress did not have the power to modify the Constitution through regular legislation.
Doing this, the Supreme Court established the principle in judicial review and expanded the powers by having the power to declare a law unconstitutional.
Hope that helps your question.
