1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
natulia [17]
3 years ago
14

Which statement comparing the Middle Ages to the Renaissance is false?

History
2 answers:
Vesnalui [34]3 years ago
3 0
The correct answer is A. The arts and sciences flourished during both time periods.
Reptile [31]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A. The arts and sciences flourished during both time periods.

Explanation:

The statement that states a false idea is statement A. It is not true that the arts and sciences flourished during both the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. While arts and sciences were present during both eras, the Renaissance saw a much larger production, a much deeper appreciation of these subjects and a higher quality of work in all areas.

You might be interested in
What point did both Nikita Khrushchev and Richard Nixon both try to make in the "kitchen debate"?
Stels [109]
The correct answer is B.

During the Kitchen Debate, Richard Nixon and Nikita Khrushchev were examining a model of a typical American home that the average American could afford. However, during this debate, Khrushchev challenged Nixon as he felt that not all Americans could have a home like this, while in the Soviet Union you would be guaranteed a home just for being a citizen. Khrushchev goes onto argue that even peasants in the Soviet Union can afford a standard house.


8 0
3 years ago
1) Is there anything Native Americans could have done to not allow European explorers to settle in the Americas?
tatuchka [14]

1) They could've tried to defend the European Explorers to not set foot on there land, even though they might've all died in war.

2) Horrible, they got there first, its theirs, and they don't deserve the diseases the Europeans do, they can stay to their religion, and its not a big deal.

4 0
3 years ago
Who might have had a negative view of Roman expansion during this period, and why?
Fudgin [204]

Answer:

2. Plebeians would have objected to this expan- sion because they had to serve in the army. Defeated people would have objected because they had to serve in the army, pay Roman taxes, and couldn't always become Roman citizens.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
I need help it is not c
xxMikexx [17]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Anyone knows these :c?
PtichkaEL [24]
The answer for the first one is b this is because the article talks about the Boston tea party and the Boston tea party was to protest against British tariffs (taxesj
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • President Truman’s chief priority in using the atomic bomb against Japan was to _____. A. save American lives B. prepare for a U
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following actions of territorial aggressions by Nazi Germany ultimately resulted in a declaration of war by Great B
    6·1 answer
  • What is the focus of Article l of the Constitution?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the primary reason for the economy that occur in the united states after world war two
    14·1 answer
  • Why was Wilhelm ll determined to build up the German army and navy ?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did conflict often arise between royal governors and colonial legislatures?
    8·1 answer
  • The Hellenistic Age came to an end around
    11·1 answer
  • How did cyrus and darius maintain control of the persian empire ?
    15·1 answer
  • Ang davao city ay nasa hilaga ng blank at kanluran ng blank.​
    11·1 answer
  • China and Great Britain were pursuing competing interests in the 19th century. The British wanted to create a positive trade bal
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!