Answer:
I think is primary.......
Answer:
a writ of attachment
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is a request for a writ of attachment. This is a request made to a court in order for the court to seize an asset of the defendant until an court sentenced debt is paid to the accusing party. Which is the case in this scenario since Everett asks the court to seize Donald's property until Donald pays Everett the money that the court sentenced him to pay.
Answer:
Gain from selling at the split-off point = $12 * 2,300
Gain from selling at the split-off point = $27,600
Gain from Processing further = $14 * 2,300 - Processing cost ($10,300)
Gain from Processing further = $
32,200 - $10,300
Gain from Processing further = $21,900
<u>Overall profit</u>
= $27,600 - $21,900
= $5,700 (Decrease in overall profit
)
Hence, if product QI is processed further and sold, then overall profit will be decreased by $5,700
Answer:
Option (B) $156,667
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Number of stock options granted = 94,000
Fair value of the option-pricing = $5
Vesting period, from December 31, 2015 to January 1, 2019 = 3 years
Now,
Compensation expense to be recognized
= [ Number of stock options granted × fair value of option ] ÷ [ vesting period ]
= [ 94,000 × 5 ] ÷ 3
= $156,667
Hence,
Option (B) $156,667
Answer: Option D is correct.
Rhonda Miller wants to assess how much using loan finance will cost in todays value. There are also finance lease facility available to fund the asset which means Rhonda must opt to the better option to save maximum. Calculating Present Value of annuity is the suitable option which helps in understanding how much this source of finance cost opposed to the use of finance lease.