Which of the following energy producing technologies can be beneficial to soil quality?

2 answers:

6 0

<span>Both solar energy and wind energy are beneficial to soil quality. They are not using fossil fuels that both harm the soil with digging and fracking, but also are not being burnt which harms the air and can create acid rain. Both solar and wind are using nature to benefit the world. As long as the sun keeps burning and the world turning, we will continue to be able to use them.</span>

gtnhenbr [62]3 years ago

5 0

the answer is a. biomass

You might be interested in

A continental rift is also called a

Fynjy0 [20]

#6- Plate Boundry.....................

6 0

2 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST PLEASE ANSWER QUICK

konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

Greenhouse affect - atmosphere traps heat

Ice age - coldest phase of climate cycle

Sun's output - can vary

Greenhouse gases - atmosphere traps even more heat

4 0

3 years ago

According to the Charter of 1732, what was the MOST important product for the Georgia Colony to produce?

zlopas [31]

Answer:

One of the three reasons for Georgia's founding. King George II hoped that Georgia would be able to produce wine, rice, silk, and indigo. The King hoped that the new colony would bring economic prosperity to England.

4 0

2 years ago

What is a major feature of mediterrian architecter?

erma4kov [3.2K]

Hello There! ^_^

Your question: What is a major feature of Mediterranean architecture..?

Your answer: Pastel- colored walls, huge windows, terraces, and open air balconies are the major features of Mediterranean architecture

Hope this helps!

3 0

3 years ago

How does Uniformitarianism relate to the disaster at Chernobyl.

Talja [164]

Answer: Exactly the same way since the very begining of our existence?

Explanation: Uniformitarianism suggests that the processes that rule the Earth have always been the same.

The only thing that comes to my mind and that has something to do with the disaster of Chernobyl is that all the radioactive and hazardous activity somehow could have affected the structure of the soil. It´s not pretty clear, but in practical terms, I wouldn´t build another facility on at least 30 miles around Chernobyl or Pripyat.

8 0

3 years ago