<h3>
♫ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~Hello There!~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♫</h3>
➷ It is an example of 'hard power'
<h3><u>
✽</u></h3>
➶ Hope This Helps You!
➶ Good Luck (:
➶ Have A Great Day ^-^
↬ ʜᴀɴɴᴀʜ ♡
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
amortization expense is $36000
Explanation:
given data
purchased = $180000
time = 5 year
to find out
amount recorded as amortization expense
solution
we know here purchased patent for 180000 and here life is 5 years
so here
amortization expense will be purchased / time
amortization expense = purchased / time
amortization expense = 180000 / 5
so amortization expense is $36000
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in a microsoft excel document.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a single sheet with the formulas indications.
Answer:
The required return for the new project is 6.87%
Explanation:
In order to calculate the required return for the new project we would have to calculate the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) adjusted by risk adjustment factor
.
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) = [After Tax Cost of Debt x Weight of Debt] + [Cost of equity x Weight of Equity]
After -tax Cost of Debt = 3.40%
Cost of Equity = 10.80%
Weight of Debt = 0.39
Weight of Equity = 0.69
Therefore, the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) = [After Tax Cost of Debt x Weight of Debt] + [Cost of equity x Weight of Equity]
= [3.40% x 0.39] + [10.80% x 0.69]
= 1.32% + 7.45%
= 8.77%
The required return for the new project = Weighted Average Cost of Capital – Risk Adjustment Factor
= 8.77% - 1.90%
= 6.87%
The required return for the new project is 6.87%
