1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yarga [219]
3 years ago
7

Which of these is an argument against the production of genetically engineered food

History
1 answer:
IrinaVladis [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

D. Genetically engineered food is unnatural and possibly dangerous to eat

Explanation:

One of the biggest arguments about the genetically engineered food is that it is not natural food and it can be dangerous to eat. It is still hard to evaluate the effect of the majority of the GMO's as they have been introduced very recently. There are some GMO's that have proven to be very damaging though, like the GMO soy for example. It has been proved that this soy actually manages to reduce the amount of testosterone in the men, and that it is the main cause why the testosterone in the men in the Western world has dropped as much as 50% in the past few decades. The women have increased levels of anxiety, aggression, and depression because of the GMO soy. So taken this in consideration it doesn't seem that it is a good choice to consume this type fo foods.

You might be interested in
How did Natural Rights Theory influence the English colonists in America?
Lisa [10]

Answer:

i hope this helps <3

Explanation:

The single most important influence that shaped the founding of the United States comes from John Locke, a 17th century Englishman who redefined the nature of government. ... The duty of that government is to protect the natural rights of the people, which Locke believed to include life, liberty, and property.

:)

7 0
3 years ago
Was the system of<br> alliances the only<br> reason other nations<br> entered the war?
Leona [35]
The United Nations pact of 1889
6 0
4 years ago
District courts are the only federal courts that
bija089 [108]
A. have original jurisdiction

Original jurisdiction refers to the power to hear a case for the first time, as opposed to appellate jurisdiction, which is the power of a higher court to review a lower court's decision.

The Code of Laws of the United States of America (shortened to just United States Code or U.S.C.) states it this way:  "T<span>he </span>district courts<span> shall have </span>original jurisdiction<span> of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States."</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is the home Minister of Uttar Pradesh <br>​
andrezito [222]

Answer:

Yogi Adityanath

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read this excerpt from an argumentative essay. Jefferson makes a valid point when he argues for a limited government. Lincoln, o
givi [52]
The excerpt has<span> an </span>effective style<span> and </span>tone because it is. formal and objective. Also, <span>It includes a clear topic sentence and provides </span>effective<span> support.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What colony was purchased for the purpose of providing an outlet to the sea? Delaware New Jersey Pennsylvania
    15·2 answers
  • Help history corrections will give brainliest. what's the answer I got it wrong
    11·1 answer
  • Please help this text makes no sense to me
    14·2 answers
  • The economic, political problems that plagued the 13 states set the stage for the Continental
    11·2 answers
  • Which characteristics of government did the U.S. Constitution codify in 1787? select 3
    15·2 answers
  • Please help! I'll upvote all responses.
    7·1 answer
  • Why do you think the vikings did not try to colonize americas
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement describes a common feature of both French and American revolutions?
    10·1 answer
  • What organization led the conservative attack on Roosevelt in 1934 and 1935? Who were its main supporters?
    10·1 answer
  • Although ineffective in warfare, the chemical gas struck fear of soldiers who had to
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!