This is a opinion based answer but there is 3 main answers to this question one is yes they should be able to take their rights away because us having the freedom to do anything can be dangerous for the government second is no they shouldn’t just because we are going into war doesn’t give them the rights to take our freedoms away because it could cause more problems within the way and the third is no they shouldn’t be able too unless their given a valid reason to take their right and then give an example
It was one of the first revolutions of its kind to occur non-violently, making it 'glorious'.
Answer:
Option C (study a variety of subjects) is the right option.
Explanation:
- Humanists have highlighted the significance of moral principles rather than just religious views.
- Humanists including its reformation are sometimes devout Christians, and therefore everyone's sponsorship of fundamentalist as well as non-religious principles often placed them in conflict mostly with the Christian faith.
The latter given preferences aren't related to the particular circumstance. So the above answer is the correct one.
Because japan was using iwo jima as a landing strip to aid other allies and themselves in the war and thats how they transported supplies.
Brainliest please
