Answer:
1. He was A French military officer; he also was a political leader. He rose to prominence during the French revolution. Many of his campaigns were a success. He led to power by starting off as a military officer.
2. Napoleon had stabilized France, He brought it in good reforms, but not the way the French Revolution wanted it to be. By taking power, he didn't share the power equally, back to what had started the Revolution with Estates and Political Inequality. Another thing they argued about was that Napoleon was the best of Military leader of all time.
The technologies were only used to observe enemies but as their effectiveness became apparent, both sides started to dismantle what they were using. For example, they shot down the planes that they would see causing more death.
Answer:
It doesn't seem like any of these seem to apply- I suggest trying to look elsewhere for answers or looking for a summary on these amendments to see which one fits best. But here's what I can understand s o far in the explanation below.
Explanation:
The 1st amendment is about freedom of speech and religion.
The second is the right to bear arms for a militia.
The 5th is about being able to not answer questions during a trial, as people can say "I plead the fifth" rather than committing perjury on stand and under oath by lying.
The 14th amendment is how people born in the US are considered citizens of the US even if their parents were from other countries.
