Answer:
The treaty of Vienna change the map of Europe in the following ways;
(i) The Federalists believed in a modernized army, an effective bureaucracy and a progressive economy.
(ii) In 1815, the European powers-Britain, Siberia, Prussia, and Austria destroyed Napoleon at Vienna to the draw-up establishment of Europe.
(iii) This discussion was entertained by Austrian Chancellor-Duke Metternich.
(iv) The Treaty of Vienna of 1815 was signified to invalidate most of the differences which were occured due to the Napoleonic War.
(v) The dismissed Bourbon Dynasty was reinstalled to power.
Answer:
Because people during the reconstruction were fighting due to slavery (the civil war) or the rights of african americans. The civil right movement was like a continuation or amendment of that reconstruction era to guarantee people of all races the same rights and abolish racial segregation; this actually never came to light when slavery was abolished and the reconstruction era ended.
Answer:
In Katz v. USA (1967), the most important Fourth Amendment case, the defendant was sentenced by a federal court for illegal gambling. He organized them using a long-distance telephone, which was the crime against federal law. The judge admitted evidence to the trial in the form of telephone recordings of the accused received by the FBI agents. They installed eavesdropping equipment outside the telephone booth with which the accused called while committing a crime. The Supreme Court rejected the conviction.
Despite the fact that in the Katz case, the Court emphasized the protection of a person’s private life, rather than premises, it made one reservation: “The Fourth Amendment should not be construed as a basis for the adoption of a common “right to privacy.”
The decision in the Katz case is of great importance also for another reason. Judge Harlan, who joined the majority opinion, defined the criteria subsequently used by the courts to establish a violation or non-violation of the Fourth Amendment as a result of specific actions by the authorities. This criterion is called “reasonable expectation of privacy.” The criterion is based on two premises: first, a person must show a valid (subjective) expectation of respect for the right to privacy; secondly, this expectation must be of such a kind that society can recognize it as "reasonable."
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: quick couple service fitting and that design <span>reduce venting and mixing of refrigerants during service.
</span>hfc-134a has a better process of refrigerants venting and mixing compared to <span>cfc-12 a/c system. This reduce the toxicity level of air conditioner which make it possible for the Air conditioner to be installed in small/cramped space such as cars</span>
