Answer:
c) This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
Since the student version adequately referenced the source, this is not a example of plagiarism. The student version started with the naming of the source and followed with the key takeaways from their elaboration. Additionally, the student version provided a brief, conclusion to the problem, which is the added scientific value to pure referencing.
India's comparative advantage in the global competition will be "Low-cost labor".
- Over the past couple of years, India however has preserved significant competitive advantages throughout the production of medicines as well as a variety of tradeable commodity manufactured goods.
- Despite the reality that the requirements for becoming a distribution center continuously improving, certain manufacturing investments are expected to somehow be untouched by technology.
Thus the above answer i.e., "option a" is the right answer.
Learn more about the global competition here:
brainly.com/question/15637941
Answer:
given statement is true
Explanation:
given data
sells blankets = $25 each
variable cost = $10
fixed cost = $4,500,000
break minus even point = 300,000 units
to find out
true/ false
solution
we will check here break minus even point for find true or false
so here
Contribution is express as = sells blankets - variable cost
Contribution = $25 - $10 = $15
so
break minus even point = 
put here value
break minus even point = 
break minus even point = 300,000
so we can say given statement is true
Answer:
The correct answer is b) American will leave fares unchanged and Southwest will leave fares unchanged.
Explanation:
The Nash Balance is a situation where individuals or players have no incentive to change their strategy taking into account the strategy of their opponents.
In the Nash equilibrium, the strategy chosen by each participant of a conflict or game is optimal, given the strategy chosen by the others. In other words, nobody will gain anything if they decide to change their strategy under the assumption that the other individuals do not change theirs.
It should be noted that under the Nash equilibrium the greatest gain is not necessarily obtained for all individuals or players as a whole. It is only true that each responds optimally to the strategy of others. In many cases, individuals would like to be able to reach another balance with higher profits but fail to do so because they face the risk of being betrayed.
Different academic abilities, a lot of time and work
