Many people believed that the Church needed to be reformed. In the 1500s Kings such as Charles V had a sole political strategy: centralisation. However, there were people who do not agree with this. So, the reformation led to warfare because of different ideas by the ruler and his people.
I believe it's B. Economics policies. During his presidency, he put forth a lot of economic policies.
The purpose of the United States signing treaties with Native Americans was so that Native Americans can have land in North America.
Not sure but hope what I know help a little...Slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” said Abraham Lincoln in the 1850s. Yet in his first inaugural address, Lincoln declared that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.” He reiterated this pledge in his first message to Congress on July 4, 1861, when the Civil War was three months old.<span>Did You Know?When it took effect in January 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation freed 3.1 million of the nation's 4 million slaves.</span>
What explains this apparent inconsistency in Lincoln’s statements? And how did he get from his pledge not to interfere with slavery to a decision a year later to issue an emancipation proclamation? The answers lie in the Constitution and in the course of the Civil War. As an individual, Lincoln hated slavery. As a Republican, he wished to exclude it from the territories as the first step to putting the institution “in the course of ultimate extinction.”
Answer:
When the Populist Party saw that the two major parties were falling, they took it as an opportunity to gain voters for the next elections. They blamed the terrible state of the economy of both parties, not just one. More voters rushed to the party, but the party dissolved soon.
