Answer: Brian will have $700 dollars to pay the medical bill balance
Explanation: You already know your total is $3,000. Subtract 3,000 - 2,300, which will give you $700.00
Answer:
$15,960
Explanation:
The total profit on units sold for the consignor:
= Sales Value - Cost of Goods Sold - Shipping Expenses - Commission - Advertising Expenses - Installation and setup costs
= (40 × $720) - (40 × $220) - [$1,850 × (40/50)] - ($28,800 × 5%) - $470 - $650
= $28,800 - $8,800 - $1,480 - $1,440 - $470 - $650
= $15,960
Assess organizational resources and evaluate risks and opportunities, It is this step in the marketing planning process that best corresponds to the articulation of a 10% increase in sales.
The marketing planning process is a methodical strategy for achieving marketing objectives. The marketing planning process includes the following steps: scenario analysis, goal-setting, strategy formulation, action programme development, implementation, control, review, and assessment. All of the managerial tasks of the company are coordinated with the aid of marketing planning process. In order to accomplish the general aims and goals of the company, it not only assists in coordinating the work of its own department but also in coordinating the managerial operations of every other department. Market penetration strategy, market development strategy, product development strategy, and diversification strategy are the four different types of the marketing planning processes.
Learn more about the marketing planning process here:
brainly.com/question/14545519
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. AirEurope should produce if it wants to maximize its profit.
2. False
Explanation:
New payoffs after subsidy:
Aircraft/ AirEurope Produce Not Produce
Produce -3 , <u>6</u> 75 , 0
Not Produce 0 , 74 0 , 0
With a $9 million subsidy, regardless of whether Aircraft produces or not, AirEurope should<u> produce</u> if it wants to maximize its profit.
The statement is false (Aircraft would earn a negative payoff if it enters).
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
