Answer:
The main conflict is the quest Isabelle goes on to find the pieces of her heart and the way Donnelly addresses that, and how it contributes immensely to everyone’s character development, is my favorite thing in the book.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is 1. incomplete comparison.
Explanation:
In the example, there can certainly exist a logical relation between the two propositions (inquisitive students - make - better students), however, since there is not enough information, a logical relation between them cannot be properly constructed. If the comparison presented some sort of argument then it would be complete. For instance: "Inquisitive children, <em>since they are more curious and open to learning</em>, make better students". Without the argument, the idea seems more like an unsustained opinion, based on prejudice, than anything else.
Nixon was already President of the United States when he and his staffers broke the law in the
Watergate scandal. What about their positions of power may have contributed to their
corruption?
