The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you forgot to attach the options for this question, we can say the following.
Lincoln uses repetition in this sentence to emphasize the idea that "ultimate sacrifice given by the soldiers on this ground."
When United States President Abraham Lincoln repeated the parallel construction he tried to emphasize the ultimate sacrifice given by the Union soldiers and Confederate soldiers on that ground of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
This sentence is part of the famous Gettysburg address delivered by him on November 19, 1863. Previously to that above-mentioned line, Lincoln had said the following: <em>"We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live."</em>
This can serve us to understand the whole idea of the excerpt.
It guaranteed the rights of individuals against the wishes of the King.
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
The correct answer is France
When the French revolution happened, most of the Nobility that hadn't escaped was executed, and all things relating to the Church were forbidden. Even the calendar was changed because the names of months were related to Christian things. It influenced numerous political revolutions, Haiti just being one of the country that started a revolution.
I don't know all of the answers but here are the ones I do know:
5. 5,000 men were sent to the west
8. Every man from Ai was killed. The king of Ai was brought to Joshua alive but was hung and killed later.
9. Mount Ebal
10. A copy of the law of Moses
11. He read to the people the word of the law.
I really hope that this helps!!
