The answer to this question is b 65%
The essay on the Why are there laws limiting the freedom of speech is written below.
<h3> Why are there laws limiting the freedom of speech?</h3>
The freedom of a person to express oneself is very important to man's ability to pass out their opinions, convictions, and also their beliefs, and to be able to be involved in democracy.
The Supreme Court was known to have stated some measures of restrictions on speech as a result or based on its content.
This is one that is seen in the area of if the government targets the speaker's message and thus violate the First Amendment.
Gehan, 2021, stated that the common justificatory approaches that is often used in a set of jurisdictions to frame the state’s burden was the need or the justification of the limitations on the freedom of expression via the use of the proportionality test.
Citation:
Gunatilleke, Gehan. (2021). Justifying Limitations on the Freedom of Expression. Human Rights Review. 22. 1-18. 10.1007/s12142-020-00608-8.
Learn more about freedom of speech from
brainly.com/question/243946
#SPJ1
Beginning at the end of the nineteenth century, immigration into the United States rocketed to never-before-seen heights. Many of these new immigrants were coming from eastern and southern Europe and for many English-speaking, native-born Americans of northern European descent the growing diversity of new languages, customs, and religions triggered anxiety and racial animosity.
In reaction, some embraced nativism, prizing white Americans with older family trees over more recent immigrants and rejecting outside influences in favor of their own local customs. Nativists also stoked a sense of fear over the perceived foreign threat, pointing to the anarchist assassinations of the Spanish prime minister in 1897, the Italian king in 1900, and even President William McKinley in 1901 as proof. Following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in November 1917, the sense of an inevitable foreign or communist threat grew among those already predisposed to distrust immigrants.
The sense of fear and anxiety over the rising tide of immigration came to a head with the trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti. Sacco and Vanzetti were Italian immigrants who were accused of participating in a robbery and murder in Braintree, Massachusetts, in 1920. There was no direct evidence linking them to the crime, but—in addition to being immigrants—both men were anarchists who favored the destruction of the American market-based, capitalistic society through violence. At their trial, the district attorney emphasized Sacco and Vanzetti’s radical views, and the jury found them guilty on July 14, 1921.
Despite subsequent motions and appeals based on ballistics testing, recanted testimony, and an ex-convict’s confession, both men were executed on August 23, 1927.
